RE: Placing Wednesday24 Apr 2023 10:40
ASI - I don't know if you've been in this situation and can confirm some of this or not but an acquaintance suggested the following (he's not professionally involved in Zimbabwe and doesn't know the legal system there but some of this sounds reasonable and could explain the length of time).
'Once the legal case was settled in court, there would be processes that both the government and central bank had to follow. Rather than VAST toddling along to the central bank with a note from the court, it would be for the government to instruct the central bank to release the diamonds... that instruction would have to be composed by government lawyers and agreed/signed off by government minister(s).... it would probably include a transfer of ownership of the diamonds from the gov't to VAST. Along with the instruction to release the diamonds, there might also be some requirement for VAST to detail what they were then going to do with the diamonds and get approval for that. Given the lapse in time since VAST were last operational in Zim, they may have had to renew a licence or 2 to handle and sell the diamonds. The central bank would have their own processes to validate the court ruling, the instruction from the government and VAST's title to the diamonds. The bank might also want a plan for the physical release of the diamonds including security arrangements. Once all the paperwork and approvals were complete, it might take some time to actually schedule the physical release for practical and security reasons. At the point where the gov't were indicating that it would happen at the end of April/middle of May, my guess is that the government had done all that they needed to do and that it was in the hands of the central bank to validate the paperwork, approve and schedule the release.'
From your experience, does that sound reasonable? Would VAST need to have/renew any licences to handle/sell/export the diamonds?