Member Info for SteJSteJ

At least the poor PI gets some opportunity to be involved, and the discount isn't too brutal compared to some placings I've seen

TMS has a high risk low reward strategy if he's short here.

Could be, but recent RNSs show something is progressing

Wolfe, text your mom and find out

"We will provide answers to your questions shortly, but for now, look at this big nugget"

I have never heard of any dividend paid on anything other than a per share basis. What you are describing sounds unusual

What, like "Due diligence completed" was that cryptic?

Young man, there's a place you can go.
I said, young man, when you're short on your dough

Quit banging the drum Selecta.
There has clearly been a non binding offer ( I believe there was discussion about non bindings in a previous RNS) that's in the ball park for all parties, otherwise there would be no reason to do the DD. We are at the stage where said offer is either being withdrawn, or converted to binding following the DD completion.

Not really a great post Roger. The offer will dictate the shareprice. The BOD will want this to be as high as possible as the SP will rerate to the offer + residual value.
The dividend payout is academic.
Publicity will come from the offer, not the dividend

This still going on? Give it a rest both of you

Even though DD has been completed recently, you feel no deal is the likely outcome?
I accept nothing is guaranteed, but all the evidence in the RNS's show the steps of a deal pogressing. How do you read that differently out of interest?

Jackdaw is clearly trying to make a point that taking the deal would have yielded a profit due to an increase in SP on BVX. But you know that already don't you?
I'm pointing out that it's a fallacy, as the deal on the table was so bad that it needs to 20bag to get close to break even. But again, you know that.
Not really any need for name calling there really is there?
Fine, I'll take your point that you found out about this share via the proposed deal and have made about 30% . Add in what's been lost on MTFB here and you'll be down still, as admitted by saying you are recovering your investment.

Point is, the implication by Jackdaw is that we would be in profit had we taken the deal, when the reality is we would still be very much down

And I bought other completely unrelated shares and made money. Doesn't really have much to do with MTFB now does it?
Take your point that BVX is in profit for those that bought in when it listed, but Jackdaw is clearly posting in relation to the "what could have been" from MTFB.
I could post at how well VLS is doing lately. Not really relevant is it?

Is this going again? Selecta, where do you see Mac saying we have accepted an offer? We are at that stage in general M&A timeline, but no one is saying that.
You saying it hasn't happened really doesn't help anyone IMO as it's obvious as there has been no RNS

Well no, as we would need BVX to 20 bag in order to offset the share consolidation. I see it being up only about 10% so still a 93% loss if the deal had been approved.

Come back to this thread when BVX is at 400p and we can talk about what might have been

What makes you think there will be a suspension?

Andre, he likes that but and he cannot like

Read the RNS's since you bought in is probably a good idea

Added to some index or something maybe...