RE: Thank you Robjm6613 Jan 2026 09:20
@NickE
Great post. I've been saying for years that our Reserves are hugely under-stated, but now I can see that has been intentional. The 1moz reserves / 1.7moz resource was always big enough to make KEFI commercially viable as a mine and as an investment. That was all that has been needed to get the show on the road. KEFI have been very clever to protect the upside potential, keeping close to 100% of the long-term value within KEFI.
I've previously spent a long time (when gold was circa $3,500!) looking into the 2015 DFS, and I came to the conclusion that everything within the resource, right down to the exploration cut-offs, was now commercially viable. It seems that KEFI are also now suggesting that, with their comments about adding in the processing of the previously waste spoil heaps. Yes the recovery is not as good as the high-grade ore, but it still adds huge value.
Then you would also have to look at the cut-off grades in the exploration, and the likely impact on changing that to a lower cut-off grade. If you think of the ore body as a sphere, the impact of lowering the cut-off grade, to include more ore body in the resource, it is like increasing the diameter of a sphere. When the diameter increases in one dimension, the volume grows in three dimensions. So a 10% increase in the strike length (due to a lower cut off now being commercially viable) would increase the volume of the ore body by circa 33%!! A 20% increase in strike length would increase the ore body volume by circa 73%!!!
The way that Harry as structured the finance deals, KEFI protect the upside, which is something that KEFI have been intentional about. I reckon that they know TK is a 3moz-5moz mine, all day long! The fact that the job advertisements for positions at Tulu Kapi are also listed as having a 12 year duration would also back up that assumption.