RE: Hostilities still vast speculation19 Feb 2026 15:24
@Crisu II = Institutional Investors. Currently KEFI is strictly not 100% financially de-risked, as the last $20m has not yet been signed-off, so therefore it would still be deemed to high a risk for any institutional organisation to invest. Being 99% funded isn't good enough - if it's not 100%, then it's deemed high-risk. Therefore due to institutional rules and regulations, it is unlikely that any fund managers would be allowed to invest in KEFI. Once that last $20m is signed off, then fund managers can go to their boss with a proposal to invest in KEFI, without risk of being shot down at the first hurdle.
A TR1 is a required notification. Typically nobody knows who the other shareholders are, but once a single shareholder goes above owning 3% of the company, then they have to release a TR-1. Currently this would be an holding of circa £60m. This is the kind of money that IIs will be throwing about, which makes PI money seem like chickenfeed.
It's also relevant that II investments are for a 5-year+ plan. They invest based on logic and numbers, and they are not swayed by rogue posters on message-boards or twitter lol. They are sticky hands, compared to fickle PIs.
You can understand then why it will be II investment that will bring about the KEFI re-rate. I hope that we will start to see IIs building positions as soon as we get that last $20m signed off, and by the end of March it will be a very different landscape