RE: Looks like....7 Oct 2025 10:38
PrivateInvestor1....."What a load of rubbish. De-risking is not a fallacy at all. It's about capital preservation and nothing to do with emotion. If the price has gone up 100% you now have twice the capital at risk from when you bought, by 'de-risking' say by selling half of your holding you are now risking the same amount of capital as at the beginning.
Yes there is opportunity risk of the price going up but now you have managed your risk and protected your capital. Whereas if you don't sell any and the price has gone to 0 then you have no capital left whatsoever. There are several examples of companies going to 0 and people losing all their money.
It's not about the emotion of missing out on £1,000 versus losing £1,000 it is all about risk management which is why most PIs lose money as they don't manage risk well enough."
Everything that you're saying is correct, but I think you're missing the point (or perhaps we disagree on the premise) that money is just another asset. So you are not necessarily managing risk, you've just moving value to a different asset, both of which carry their own risks... which include various opportunity cost risks. And yes, it would not be prudent to hold everything you own in KEFI shares, just like it would not be prudent to hold everything you own in property or cash or any asset class.
The point still stands that a forgone £1,000 is worth the same as a protected £1,000. They're both worth a £1,000.
You do make a reasonable point though, which is that if all you had in the world was that £1,000, then perhaps to that individual then the first £1,000 = food and shelter, whereas the second £1,000 = a nice phone, so perhaps in that instance then £1,000 saves, does not necessarily equal an extra £1,000 earned.