RE: That would have some impact with sp.8 Nov 2023 12:26
Antonvb, you're twisting the facts to suit your agenda. What makes you believe that it is less of a mess now than when Rahul was appointed?
Unforeseen surge in oil price saved Tullow, not Rahul. Under his leadership the daily production has declined to low 50s bopd. Some reports suggest that the situation has improved in Q3 but we still need 80-90 bopd for comfort and Tullow's nowhere near those numbers. Tullow has been very unlucky with exploration since 2019 and nothing's changed on that front with Rahul at the helm. Rahul attempted a merger with Cairn, which looked good on paper but the IIs of the latter blocked it, mainly because of the low SP (i.e. instant value for money) and lack of strategy. Then, Rahul tried to use his connections to secure a partner but failed. Two oil companies left Turkana project and we're left holding the baby. This makes me think it's a mess. (see the first question above) Finally, the SP is lower than it was when he was appointed with record oil prices in the meantime... In their presentation of full year results they talked about expiration of hedges in May and how that's going to help us with increased cash flow but with the current mess I don't think it has materialised. IMV, Rahul has to go and the CFO has to go. They need to appoint someone who knows how to bring the production up to 80-90 bopd and then the words such as "robust portfolio" would have some meaning.