RE: Timelines17 Feb 2022 09:45
Thanks for that haggis and blackgold.
It seems to me that the 3D seismic is an order of magnitude different in terms of time/complexity for the two different objectives.
For CH1, the location is known, it's a matter of establishing how far they want to go and what they hope to get. On the other hand, the rest of the seismic is about establishing the optimal locations for subsequent drills, which seems much riskier and complex.
WTFDIK, but it would make sense to do the CH1 seismic first and proceed to drill and while doing the rest of the seismic in parallel. Anyone heard from the company about their plans?