Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Just thought I would nash back in to wish you all Merry Xmas and a Happy New Year :)
Not posted in a while but still read the boards to keep up to date with whats what, been a rubbish year for many not just on here so hopefully 2022 will bring some more joy to you all? :)
I can barely figure out whats going on here never mind learning how to chart lol! So do you see a reversal anytime soon? I know that decending triangles are defined as bearish but if they break out of that pattern it quickly becomes bullish?
I find random stuff like this interesting even if I will probs never use it in a meaningful way, its still good to learn about it all though but do me one fav stop mentioning low numbers that wind people up, it does you no favours and just leads to more animosity aimed towards you unless you are doing it for your own dastardly deeds :o Tbh I dont care if you are or not you wouldn't be the first person to do so on these boards but when anyone mentions an sp number high or low it just looks like a games being played and not an honest sp prediction, not all the time though but then again who am I to say that considering I done it last year on EUA! Tbf that was after going over the ACF report and pretending to myself I understood it all! Realy stupid thing to do!
Appreciate the reply I'm off to bed
Cheers Joe lad, the only reason I asked is because of what the YTer said, still not overly sure on charting though far to many unknowns for me that can ruin a chart but I suppose charts can work for some.
Asking due to the amount of obvious games being played by some on here lately! One question I do ask myself is do these people know they are being obvious or do they think they are playing it clever or is is they just dont care? Notice the way I dont mention which side of the coin I mean, reason being is because its both sides so I wonder who will win?
Anyway question for JoeBloggs, the lad I said I watch on YT says that all gaps on the way down always get filled so due to there being a gap to 16p do you see it rising to that price anytime soon?
Cheers
Possible Joe but I'd be surprised if he didn't have atleast one person keeping him up with whats going on but then does that not lead to insider trading? Who knows? Interesting AGM if no more RNS's are released until then though? Exercise time so ty for the replies.
74500000 shares @ =
@17.74p = £13,216,300 - Assuming he did buy?
@14.5p = £10,802,500 - Offer price
@15p = £11,175,000 - Todays current sp
Questions I would be asking is why would he buy that amount unless he knew something was brewing but to counter that why would he not know a placing was incoming? Doesn't make sense but then again he knows way more about GGP than I will ever do.
sandgrounded hopefully that is true, time will tell.
Gadbury I have no idea? Maybe hes just doing what he said and is buying in, he is entitled to. I'm not sayin bad news, good news or any news is due, I'm saying none of us actually know :)
My whole ranty post was mainly to allow alternate views if they have some possibility of happening, dont just abuse the poster.
Read a few comments now saying the raise could be down to good news about to come out so allows the big boys in cheap but due to how some people were basically abused when even mentioning the possibility of a placing then for badness (Yes I am going there pfft) I'm going to ask what if its the opposite?
What if they are doing this before drill results that dont look so good come out as they know a placing after that will be much lower? < This is as possible as the alternative so slate me all you like, I wont be surprised it will just prove my point even more!
Oh no did he just say that, the one who still hasn't bought in so he can get in cheaper! I mean come on eh the sooner we all realise none of us know what realy is going on behind the scenes the better so anyone making out they do are talking rubbish! Maybe before attacking anyone with a differing view you allow them their opinion. Yea, yea some are obvious derampers well guess what some are obvious rampers and no one should be trusted, pay attention to their posts but NEVER just believe anything anyone posts!
Also these boards are funny, it shows you the morals of some people, posters dare not post any alternative viewpoint for fear of being slated but when proven correct no apologies are made hmm? To leave it on a positive note I hope any upcoming news whatever it may be sends the sp rising, I realy do hope the alternative is true, no matter what some may think about this post the only thing I want to see happen for anyone playing the share game is them making money, its what we are all here for, its a shame some do it more dodgily than others.
"Libero
No Opinion
Help me understand10 Oct '20
How is a South-African AIM-listed loss-making business valued over £1,000,000,000 at present?
Am I missing something?"
My response "Ooof I'm already feeling the pain thats about to be inflicted onto you! Oh and to answer your question, yes you are missing something, its called research!"
Hmmm ok this was the actual convo, so it seems that this could be looked at both ways, I could defend myself and say it was me just telling Libero to ask questions and do *some research before posting that sort of comment BUT I wont, I'll play the bad guy role here as I cannot honestly answer if I was being a d*ck or not? If what notrader says is correct and it is kettle black etc then it proves one thing, I was an ignorant ar*ehole for responding like that to Libero and an apology should have been made!
So now begs the question, do you think you are in the wrong notrader in how you responded to Scott? I'll give you the benefit of doubt and see if you do or if you post some sort of excuse as to why you posted like you did?
I would say apologies to the board because no one wants to read all this drivel but if people cannot learn to respond in a certain way and then trawl back through 280 posts back to October last year then expect a reaction.
Ah so notrader you are one of "Those" What was the context of my comment on EUA? Oh and how long ago was it?
It seems some on here dont want anyone posting any question that comes across as negative, why? There are quite alot of competent people on here who can answer any doubters posts so you telling Scott to go "Google" or use the "Library" is pathetic. Doing research btw includes asking questions on here.
Dont care if hes a troll, goblin or a leprechaun theres a way to answer people, oh and btw just because you seem to think the wording couldn't be much clearer doesn't mean everyone is as clever as you! Hes got 3 posts and not one come across as negative! Anyway go google how to correctly repond to people, I've heard its a good source of info.
notrader ever heard of the GGP forum where helpful people and info are plentiful? You are literally saying no one should ask any questions on here and should go use Google or a library!
Goldenl nice answer, its also how I read it.
Scott ignore some and pay attention to others.
RRR not sure who was bandying £1 about last year but these things take time, will GGP ever hit £1 who knows? One thing I think just about everyone who understands even a little about GGP is that HAV will be mined at some point supposedly within 2/3 years, from SB's own mouth :) Again things can change but highly doubtful considering whats actually going on.
GGP's got good things going for it but time is needed, everything else is just noise.
"I need an answer please.
With the constant downward movement of the S P, shorting or otherwise Im thinking , could it be NCM or its associates forcing the price down with their buying up of any weak hands."
Imo 99.9% unlikely but who knows? I also would maybe expect you could receive a bit of backlash for even thinking this :o
"Q, Can they , NCM etc buy on market or are they restricted to the agreed 75% holding once they have exercised that option, if not then they could easily finish up with a much larger % of GGP than the 75% ?"
NCM could earn up to 75% of Havieron (The mine) NOT GGP if they decide to purchase the final 5% of the agreement, they currently own 70% of the mine. In an indirect way NCM could hold a bigger percentage than 75% of Hav *if they bought shares in GGP which, unless I'm mistaken is allowed?
They could own more than 75% of GGP (The company)*if they bought the whole company :)
Hope these answers help a bit better, I'm sure someone who can explain thing better will post soon.
Good thread to read nice one you lot :)
One question, what if a figure of worth cannot be agreed on or the independant valuer says a price that GGP do not want to accept do GGP have to sell the 5%? Imo it will be sold so just interested on if it *has to be sold?
Thanks
I followed this last year and seen the up and downs then ups leading to the MA not being granted so just be careful you lot, I hope it works out for those willing to take a chance though and if it is granted then interesting times ahead for OVB and those involved.
Lol and here we have Bozo Johnson allowing the opening of a coal mine while making out hes all for going green and as the Bolivian delegation mentions we have the audacity to tell them to stop while we do the exact opposite! Its these things that show you that nothing will change anytime soon, trees will be cut, mines will be dug and money will be made!