Member Info for Spikeyj

you opened a brand new lse account just to say that?

yes, i remember leonstrade as someone who was very chatty on the qpp bb and rampy on dan back around may, when the pump was in full swing. he seemed quite matey with some of qpp regulars such as brotherhumble and probably played some role in persuading a few from qpp to put money in here. -- but as bishbashbosh asks, so what? history now.

lol, my timing sucks

np. hope 2016 is good for both your finances & health.

i don't recall seeing RT saying that he wanted DAN to delist. perhaps jub is thinking about comments RT made about whether he would try to bring Quob Park into a public listing, & remarks made in the same quob blog about DAN moving to a 'premium' or 'standard' listing. http://www.quobpark.com/blog/to-list-or-not-to-list-part-one "The role of a NOMAD is currently central to the functioning of the AIM market. Many NOMADS are however driven by competitive pressures, market perceptions, and to a certain extent, self-interest. This of course could compromise their intended role as pseudo-regulators. Consequently, we question whether AIM is an appropriate market for any investment bank, including Daniel Stewart, to be listed upon. Quob Park Estate would therefore be very supportive, as we believe are other major shareholders, of seeing Daniel Stewart move away from AIM towards a Standard Listing or Premium Listing in due course. Though we do not know for certain if Daniel Stewart’s Board would share this view." clearly, the idea of moving up to a main market listing is way, way different from delisting.

hi ruga. there are two different issues involved. firstly, is DAN the company doing OK in terms of underlying business, assets and cash-flow? secondly, where will DAN holders be able to deal in its shares? if the underlying company is actually sound, solvent, and doing well, then your shares should still be worth some money to you, but it may take a while to be able to cash them in, because of the issues around the second matter. if the shares become delisted from AIM, you as an ordinary PI won't be able to do anything at all with them unless the company either manages to get the shares listed on another market, or sets up a matched bargain facility. if on another market, then you should be able to sell the shares, providing you have a broker who is prepared to deal on that new market. you will probably find that the spreads will be wider, and the broker will charge you a higher fee. if the company sets up a 'matched bargain' facility, (a less preferable option for pis than another listing) they will have to explain how investors can access it; essentially, you would only be able to sell your shares if there is another investor out there at the same time who is willing to take that specific chunk of shares off your hands. so in principal it would allow you to sell, but in practice it can take ages for a trade to get set up, and often the price achieved will not be good; effective spreads would be very wide, reflecting lack of liquidity. your best option of course is to have the shares remain on AIM and come out of suspension, in order for this to happen, they need to find a nomad quickly, but also still need to finalise audited accounts for last year. if the underlying business is actually doing very badly, then your shares won't actually be worth very much at all even if the company does find a way to list on another market sets up a matched bargain facility. (& matched bargains would be very hard to set up, as few people would want to take the other side of the trade.) clearly, there seem to be some very different views on the bb about whether the underlying business at DAN is OK or now, with some posters apparently still optimistic on that. i think in truth it's hard to be very certain about it one way or the other, since investors do not have properly audited figures to go on, but personally i thought last set of unaudited figures did not paint a good picture. if the company is doing badly, then the question will be whether it is doing so badly that it cannot continue to raise new money when needed, & loses the confidence of clients to continue dealing with it (- &/or runs out of cash to bear the costs of servicing its existing clients - ), versus being able to still generate enough cash + raise additional cash to keep ticking over, in which case your shares would still be worth something, but progressively less &

[my apologies to bb by the way, i see i posted the wrong link on my thurs 23:10, should of course have been the one related to share-p & dan.]

many thanks for the polite and considered reply. certainly, i'm reluctant to take stuff from sharepuppet at face value, they always tend to over-egg. best of luck to you in 2016.

jr2910, i'm not an accountant, but i think you've said before that you are. i see that somerville on the sharepuppets site is very scathing, to put it mildly, about the way in which those figures have been compiled, essentially suggesting that they've been cut and pasted together from previous historic figures, rather than actually representing current figures in any meaningful way. from your more expert position, do you think somerville is misrepresenting these accounts, or does he have a reasonable point? http://www.sharePUPPETS.com/views/17625/zak-mir-s-bull-call-of-the-day-no-2-clinigen-above-50-day-line-targets-800p-plus

by zak mirs, but for what it is worth: http://www.*************.com/views/17625/zak-mir-s-bull-call-of-the-day-no-2-clinigen-above-50-day-line-targets-800p-plus

& lord turner, like two peas in a pod, i bought too.

22nd June RNS: "Imaginatik plc (AIM: IMTK.L), the world's first full service innovation provider offering a range of consultancy and technology products notes the significant share price rise over the course of 19 June 2015 and confirms that it knows of no reason for such a rise. The Company is however aware of reports that Quob Park Estates has been buying shares in the Company and confirms that is has received no notification of an interest in shares from this vehicle and has had no contact with it." dr_I: "Anyways whther RT's involvement or not, 2016 looks nice for IMTK" ...look at the IMTK share price in june before RT buys. it was quob's buying that propelled this upward. it is rather important whether RT is still interested.

on whether to exit my remaining chips here. 2015 was a fantastic run, i'm rather more doubtful there's that much more to come in 2016. still holding a few, but probably will exit in jan. gla.

peter shea doesn't do cost control.

(but for the sake of balance, volume is very minimal still.)

: )

today

here we come. taken an increased chunk of this for a 12 month view. roll on! gla.

and again.

that's just the automated marking of trades. just because lse shows them as sells, doesn't mean they all were. me, i know that they weren't.