Member Info for Spikeyj

a few more trades recently, but the overall volume has
remained pretty dismal if you look back at the charts.

the RNS today makes *no mention whatsoever of barracuda*, only aje.

ADME still hasn’t released any update about the court hearing on 28/3
about barracuda & the injunction they had previously been granted to
that date. ? so it looks like they may well have lost barracuda completely,
but are just trying not to mention it anymore and hope everyone forgets?
(- no change there, that’s how ADME dealt with e.g. marginal fields fiasco!)

but their annual results are due in june, and it will be difficult for
them not to mention barracuda at all on those. i expect that they
will be attempting to get another placing away before those results
are released (… partly as they will make pretty grim reading, imv.)

“CLOUDTAG have been developing this for 6-7 years.”

? evidence?

“… remotely diagnose the individual’s nutritional & physical outputs…”

? what is a nutritional output?

lol, if you give amit “the benefit of any doubts”, then
cloudtag presumably already owns a really valuable
big runway which it can hire out to ryanair / trailfinders.

“Prior to delisting 1 or 2 year Cloudtag. ECG / Glucose was ahead
of the rest (Bands) at medical grade and ready to manufacture.”

? but where is the *evidence to back that claim up?

(? - or is that just working on the interesting
assumption that if amit said it, then it’s true?
amit mentioned lots of stuff in his interviews.)

sure. nothing’s impossible. & maybe
jdentist can offer some further info.

i appreciate the polite company/share focused posts, thanks.

“… talking about the demise of the company
from AIM is fruitless six year old history.”

but it’s still exactly the same guy running the show, with
no other directors. unlikely imo amit’s changed his spots.

so e.g. if amit was great six years ago, then he may well still be great now.
but if he was untrustworthy &/or inept six years ago, may well still be now.

particularly when there is so very little transparency regarding the nature
and value of a company’s underlying assets / intellectual property / accounts
etc, one thing that people do have to go on is the track record (achievements,
honesty, reliability) of the management team. & in this case, that’s amit alone.

so roll on may 5th when we are meant to get a big reveal.

and meanwhile, just as an interesting illustration that
harvesting & sharing biometric data can have wider value
and marketabilty other than in the healthcare arena:

The wedding tech now at the heart of couples' nuptials https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-65322101

hi rktech. just one small correction on the timeline … the nomad’s resignation
was announced on the same day as the novum placing, 24/2/17, but it was *not*
with immediate effect; nomad gave intention to resign effective from 17/4/17.

( which could have given unsuspended CTAG more time to get another nomad)

but situation then unravelled further over the next few days, with cloudtag
announcing on 28/4/17 that the placing with novum was cancelled, but also
that **nomad had accelerated their resignation**, quitting immediately c/o/b
on 27/4/17. one plausible reading would be that the nomad discovered an
additional problem over those few days which made them take an even more
negative view of cloudtag & want to dissociate themselves quicker (most
likely, ajmhv, something about what cloudtag originally told novum when
trying to set up the placing, which turned out to be a “miscommunication”.)

also, a bit baffled, tbf, why you’d think i want to “divert attention”
from what you described as my “diatribe”, presumably referring to
those two posts of mine from yesterday. on the contrary, i am very
happy for peeps to read those two posts i made regarding cloudtag,
i have no wish at all to ‘divert’ from what i posted. (so perhaps you
are right after all that i am having some trouble understanding you.)

i’m very happy to discuss cloudtag further if you have anything sensible
to say that’s actually about the company, its shares, market, CEO etc. but
if as i suspect you just want to post personal stuff / be rude, not of interest
to me, & i suggest it would belong better somewhere like twitter or facebook.

anything to say about cloudtag?

? i am curious, in what sense do you think
my references to novum were “inaccurate”?

hi avi8r. i’m sorry it was a bit difficult for you to understand.
it sounds like you might not understand who ‘novum’ are, &
what their relationship with cloudtag was. if you look back at
the CTAG RNS history for early 2017, that might assist you. hth.

it still puzzles me that there didn’t appear to be much attempt by investors to
seek compensation by legal means for the pulled placing with novum. even if
one were to accept that it resulted ‘simply’ from “miscommunication” rather than
anything more malign, ?whose fault was that, & was that error at level of severity/
recklessness / stupidity / incompetence etc that compensation could be awarded?

the bungled novum placing not only trashed the share price further, but also
seemed to accelerate the nomad’s resignation — which inter alia then meant
cloudtag had much less time to source a new nomad & retain AIM listing (& with
that, better access to funding, continued sheltered status for ISA holdings, etc.)

from an evidential perspective, that nexus where cairn resigns + the novum
placing collapses, plus the nomad’s resignation is brought forward, could
be a fruitful point for scrutiny as there will be documentary trail still with
various parties external to cloudtag where disclosure could be ordered,
& there would be a range of witnesses who could testify, again including
various outside cloudtag itself … all while still clearly under UK jurisdiction.

(... for the avoidance of doubt, m’lud, i am simply offering my own
personal opinion about a potentially fruitful focus for legal inquiry,
rather than pre-judging outcomes of any such action … in reality,
i think CTAG pis missed their best chances to probe long ago. ajmho.)

re CTAG exiting AIM, perhaps worth glancing
back at the RNS history of 6 years ago…

of note, cloudtag did not dismiss its nomad, cairn, nor decide not to
renew cairn’s contract. rather, RNSs very clear that cairn served notice
on cloudtag that the nomad was resigning. initially the company said
in feb 2017 that cairn would be resigning in april 2017, but then cairn
actually quit only a few days later, after cloudtag admitted that there
had been “miscommunication’ [*cough*] between cloudtag & novum, &
had to cancel the previously announced placing. back in 2017, cloudtag
was stating in RNS that it was in “advanced discussions” to get a new
nomad, & was “optimistic” that it would achieve that. so occam’s razor
is pretty obvious on that, imo, cloudtag was kicked off AIM because it
could not manage to find a nomad who was prepared to work with it,
rather than making a deliberate and strategic planned exit from AIM.

back in the mealy-mouthed final results RNS of march 2017, the company
admitted with risible understatement that there was “room for further
improvement” of its corporate governance, & said it would be “seeking to
appoint additional directors in the near future”. ? how did that work out?
- cloudtag’s current website only lists CEO amit as a director, no others…

(but of course i appreciate that current holders won’t mind any
of that if they receive their cash share of amit’s quarter billion
pounds on, or indeed before, may 5th. not many sleeps to go!)

hi k3, thanks for reply, hope it can come good for you here in time.

agree placing coming, but they may need to find ways to reassure
potential placees re possible litigation against the company yet to
come re the ‘accounting’ issues - me, i don’t think it was simply an
accounting ‘error’, but as always issue is what can be evidenced.

agree china a serious dilemma / headache for investing - utterly
untrustworthy actor and often economically irrational, but way
way too big to ignore / omit in the overall investment universe.

(me, i am ultrawary of taiwanese assets / investments, as sadly i
think taiwan is total toast, but that can be tricky given for example
extensive cross-holdings in the west re semi-conductor industry.)

atb

plus side, current CFO probably quite on the ball and aiming for transparency.

minus side, significant placing / seriously dilutive financing coming soon imo,
& non-trivial risk several (compensation) lawsuits will be filed against DVRG.

… minus side seems weightier than plus side, until that placing out of the way.

… but meanwhile, for those of us who are invested long in AZN on a
medium/long view [albeit with the occasional small trading slice, soz!],
AZN continues to be pretty rewarding. that 5 year chart, for instance,
tells a pretty satisfying story. there is plenty of room in the world for
both traders and investors, vive la difference, plus la meme chose, etc.

good luck and atb all honest folks.

feeding frenzy.

happy with the geopolitical call, but is pru the right company to exploit it?
- am still invested and moderately hopeful, but would like to see more signs
of purposeful movement, & successful execution, in next 1 - 1.5 years please.

it’s only a quarter of a billion quid amit is talking about. ? maybe J&J just
didn’t think that kind of trivial chump-change was worth mentioning…?

? shurely, the “right direction” is amit?

…it’s up to him to explain, as he’s
the one making all the promises.

nothing to do with HL, especially as Emo57 now holds
his golden tickets in certificated form, not through HL.

(the other avenue would be to ask a lawyer about it.)