Member Info for Spikeyj

Thanks for the reply. gl.

Scuba / CTC, just in relation to the issue of ‘character’, when you started posting as scuba back on may 5th you kept denying that you had previously been posting as CTC, and you claimed to be a new poster. that’s clearly visible in the posting history for the scuba ID.

? if you had simply asked lse admin to delete your previous posting history as CTC just because you wanted to prevent people using some old CTC posts to deduce your IRL identity, then why did you tell porkies about not being CTC? … once someone has shown proven history of lying on chatboard sites in that way, it’s hard to see how others should trust they are telling the truth in future.

Toffers, you keep telling other people they should get out of EUA fast, but also say that you’re ‘not bothered’ about the EUA shares that you claim you still hold. … so surely it would be pretty reasonable for other holders also not to feel that bothered about the points you raise?

you seem to be repeatedly trying to persuade other people to do something that you are not doing yourself.

Biden was spot on about xi, imv.

? curious, why would amit be bothered about someone who had emailing his brother in relation to a company that his brother is involved in - not sure I understand the point there? (…what’s that got to do with amit himself?)

… added.

“success fee basis” is not same as - “…only get paid if there is a successful sale.”

EUA has never explained what the actual terms are.

… more likely they will aim for a delist followed by a strike-off, rather than delist then administration, since a strike-off of unlisted company would not require them to publish the accounts. … lack of audited accounts would make it harder to unravel, cui bono?

… thing is, they’re not really in a position where they could issue an RNS saying that ‘they know of no reason’ for the share price collapse, are they?

09:35, no problem folio, you’re totally entitled to your own onion.

C’mon, folio, play nice, he’s trying to ramp the share up for you, not down. … just not as ambitious a price target as some on here are used to.

‘firesale’ of EUA ‘assets’ would get 0.1p/0.2p at best, my opinion.

? so what have you done about that, lochsong?

Stoater, if you think you have some reason to believe there was wrongdoing by someone associated with DVRG then contact FCA and outline your concern. some posters on other sites, notably copperwindow93 from advfn, said they were doing just that ( - in c/w’s case, he claimed he was forwarding on to the FCA a cache of personal messages which he had exchanged with the DVRG CEO over time, to support his assertions.)

i’m not a DVRG holder, and i simply don’t known the ins and outs of the history here, but if you have a serious concern then contact the FCA. they don’t charge you anything to report.

The company does not *need* to make any such declaration, nor does amit.

either of them can *choose* to give information about share holdings, transactions etc, if they want, but they don’t have to. and they can choose to give very partial information only, e.g. to say how many shares amit had at a particular date months or years ago, but not whether he paid anything for them, or whether he has subsequently sold them or bought more, etc.

i hope that helps you understand a bit better?

i did *not* say that amit hasn’t issued shares to himself. rather, i pointed out that the number of new shares which the company says it has issued since 2018 is far in excess of the increase in amit’s shares as last reported by cloudtag. so although it does look like he’s given himself some shares, cloudtag (a) didn’t say anything at all about whether or not amit paid anything for them, (b) hasn’t given any update about any recent changes in amit’s shareholding, & (c) hasn’t provided any information about who acquired all the other new shares, & what if anything they paid for them.

you can see those figures for yourself by going to cloudtag’s own website at: https://cloudtag.com/

the update of 23/11/22 tells you that: “As of today’s date, there are 988, 223, 763 shares in issue.”

the info on ‘significant shareholders’ under the ‘securities information’ tab [- i.e. not a media update -] tells you that at 8/9/20 the company had 942,586,567 shares in issue, with amit holding 229,394,143 shares back then.

the update on 4/10/19 stated that amit held 162,894,143 shares, and also said: “The Company has 752, 282,424 shares in issue at the date of this issue.”

the update of 4/9/19 stated that shares in issue then were: 714,882,424.

so far as i can see, cloudtag have not provided any information about any changes to total shares in issue since november 2022, & they have not provided any info about amit’s shareholding since september 2020. (…if i’ve overlooked such, happy for someone to point out that data, tia.)

what you should be able to see clearly from those figures is an increase in total shares issued between 4/10/19 and 8/9/20 of 190,304,143 shares, but with amit’s shareholding only increasing by 66,500,000. …. so nearly 129 million of those new shares were sold, or given, to someone other than amit.

“If he is paying himself in shares then he has to declare them.”

no, he doesn’t. this is a private, unlisted company registered overseas. cloudtag simply doesn’t need to tell you anything about what he is being paid, how many shares he’s bought, sold, been given, given away, etc. - don’t you even understand what kind of company this is?

if you look at cloudtag’s own website, and if you choose to believe that, the company has issued many, many new shares since 2018 way over and above what they claimed was the change in amit’s own holding. so no, it doesn’t look like it’s accounted for by amit paying himself in extra shares. (? not sure why you mention “share options” - what have options got to do with it?)

Hubba: “… I still haven’t seen any evidence of Amit selling shares since the fundraise of 2018 …”

cloudtag’s own website shows the number of shares issued has risen by hundreds of millions of shares since 2018 - assume just for the sake of argument that cloudtag’s website could be seen as a ‘credible source’ [lol] re number of shares issued, then what do you think has caused that large increase?

? is DVRG really fighting for its life?

… not much evidence of any meaningful footwork, work rate, or punches being thrown, let alone landed. …just looks like the towel has been thrown in but ref hasn’t noticed yet.

still, on the plus side, PB78 wiped out by this, karma.

Curious, posts deleted including the one about ACF forecasting £341,000,000 revenue for EUA in 2021 …. but ACF was way, way, way wrong, and not in a good way for EUA.

that’s the same ACF report which was supposedly intended for professional investors, but which was widely shared amongst ordinary pis and touted about by EUA rampers.

and yes, that’s the same ACF report forecasting £341 million 2021 revenue which mac4671 claimed was offering a “highly conservative” valuation for EUA.

09:25, BoB, it’s not my concern what you did or didn’t hear about, your biz.

happy to read / respond anything further that’s actually about EUA, the shares, the business, details of its mining plan for 2023/2024, proven resources, cash balances, plans for fundraising, sanction-related issues, etc etc. but i’m not that interested in most of to/fro off-topic personal insult stuff. cheers.

BoB, my “vanishing act” from this board was simply because LSE chose to ban me from posting on this specific board. (i understand that was because there was a mass campaign by the rampers to try to get my account closed.). but as you may be aware, i continued to post about EUA on a rival chatboard site, using the same moniker and expressing the same views. i’ve been pretty consistent.