RE: Castillo reveals plans18 May 2021 13:40
Bonker why would someone take the other side of the hedge at the then current silver price and throw in a quid pro. We have enough capital for the rare earths so how could it be a quid quo pro for that. I am a believer in Occam’s Razor and the simplest explanation, so I believe our board, who say the did it to protect Pallancata viability in case silver dropped, as happened with our also expensive to mine Arcata mine that had to close. This is from the last quarterly
report “ On 8 February 2021, the Group signed agreements to hedge the sale of 4,000,000 ounces of silver at $27.10 per ounce for 2021 and a further 4,000,000 ounces of silver at US$26.86 per ounce for 2022. This is to protect cashflows from the Pallancata mine in the next two years with the existing resource base.” Shame they did next year too, unless silver tumbled. But nice to see share price up a bit as opinion polls show election narrowing. I still bet the farmer will win, and that he will manage to get some tax rise through Congress; as metals rise we are going to see more windfall taxes around the world, see Chile where we have the rare earths, and Argentina San Jose. Despite the hedge, hopefully rising metal prices will pay the extra tax and maintain our share price.