RE: Mondays AGM13 Mar 2022 18:58
I do not claim to be the fount of all knowledge, however the article 3 and resolution 5 are quite clear.
The company can only act within its powers, these are governed by BVI law and the articles and memorandum. The articles supersede BVI law and any resolution at a GM, unless the articles themselves themselves are to be altered at a GM.
BVI law allows the disallowance of pre emption rights - so minority shareholders can be diluted ad infinitum, and thus "lose" their company. UK law does not allow this, and so to become a "respectable" company, whilst remining resident in the BVI, article 3 was inserted into the memorandum.
So to issue the 200M shares specified in resolution 5 to persons other than existing shareholders would be beyond the powers of the company, or ultra vires.
So to break it down -
"SPECIAL RESOLUTION
5. That the Directors be and are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised to exercise all the powers of the Company to allot up to 200,000,000 equity shares in the Company (representing approximately 32% of the issued share capital) for cash or to grant rights to subscribe for, or to convert any securities into, shares in the Company"
Simple - they can issue 200M shares, or grant rights over 200m shares
" provided that such authority shall expire (unless previously renewed, varied or revoked) on thedate (sic) of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company"
To expire at the next AGM
" save that the Company may before the expiry of such period make an offer or agreement which would or might require rights to subscribe for or to convert any securities into shares to be granted or equity securities to be allotted after such authority expires and the Directors of the Company may allot Equity Securities or grant such rights under any such offer or agreement as if this authority had not expired."
But they can agree before the expiry date, the next AGM, to issue the 200M shares even if the actual issuance occurs after the next AGM
"This resolution revokes and replaces all unexercised authorities previously granted to the Directors to allot shares in the Company but without prejudice to any allotment of shares or grant of rights already made, offered or agreed to be made pursuant to such authorities"
This supersedes all previous similar resolutions, unless the company has already agreed to issue those shares.
Article 3 also states the order in which the shares can be issued, so to existing shareholders in proportion, any shares left over to other existing shareholders who agree to take more than their allocation, and then, but only then to third parties.
Normally (or rather, often) resolution 5 would be accompanied by a resolution disallowing pre emption rights. Not in this case. I regard this as good news. Existing major shareholders do not want to be diluted.
Can anyone think of a reason why that might be so?