RE: Bismark30 Oct 2024 11:12
Hi All - I think the issue many have on this board is that people are picking and choosing specific facts to suit their narrative!
I agree that DB as CEO of HUM was quite loose with his language and always painted a rosy picture but actually the yearly forecasts in general were in the ballpark of expectations - always a slightly higher AISC and lower production but in the general ballpark. Some derampers on here are specifically looking at one Q to make their points (Q2 this year) and ignoring previous Qs when there is not an issue and the rampers are not taking on board there is an issue with the ramping up at Kour and that there may also be an issue with Yan now. The truth is until Q3 comes out we are all guessing and irrespective of Q3 (which due to the wet season may not be great) it is actually Q4 which is make or break for the company as there will be no excuses and this will determine the whole viability of Hum as a company. I am an investor and hold a significant amount (which I am not adding to) at an average of over 10p. I know that DB was too rosy glassed but over the years he was not massively out on his forecasts but his constant missing of targets made it hard to believe a word that came out of his mouth. Based on his previous record of always over-forecasting and underdelivering I am confident that 200,000 at $1200 AISC (roughly) across both mines is likely the high end of expectations. Basing it on his usual miss I would anticipate around 160,000 at $1400-$1600 AISC is more likely, and which would be good enough to re-rate Hum as a company. The only major question I have now is - is the expected gold actually in the Kour mine? If yes, then all good and Q3/Q4 will determine this which is why they are key and if not as stated previously we will all know by Q4 as there are no excuses. The rest of the chat between all of the rampers and derampers at present is just a waste of time and Q3/Q4 will put real data into the equation.