Member Info for Si_Derman

It's called a "discussion", moniman. And kind of pertinent to the business of the company that this board is here for.
You should try it sometime. :)

Okay, thanks Rudey.
So your original question still remains.
So could they, hypothetically, re-infect volunteers, big ask TBH, that have already had it?
With a milder form, perhaps.

I do recall something about a man in S. Korea that apparently did.

So we have ended up with experts questioning other experts and no coherent answer.

I'm sure at some point we will get calls for testing the tests that test the tests......

I think they particularly wanted NHS or public services staff.
Kind of essential to know if those on the the frontline are actually safe.

Game changer or maybe not?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-53180858

Since when was The World Health Organisation a news outlet?

So, stats posted = go off on a tangent. ???
Ooh, and a little bit of politics.

"Enough said, now just wait"
Okay, fairy nuff, discussion over then I guess.
Wont'mention it again. :)

Not withstanding the socio-economic needs of NI and the UK as a whole and how much weight they may or may not influence the final decision, Lottie is correct that the proposal should be bullet proof on all the aspects he mentions.
Having read a lot of the objection replies from the like of NIMTF, UW, RSPB i'm left wondering if they do. Yet.
This is why I suggested that there may be a lot behind the scenes interaction between Infa and DAERA since the end of the PC, to update or address the issues raised. And that is why it's taking time and why meanwhile we have been given lots of other news not related to IM. H&W, FSRU, Spanish shipbuilders, maybe hydrogen....
This is why I have not gone all in here as much as I would have liked too.
Just biding my time, whilst accruing funds elsewhere for when it's sorted.
Anyhoo, off twerk. Laters all. Have a good day. :)

Think it's the same news article that Robbie posted earlier from the BBC, Swap'.

I saw that 4D had a TR1 this morning stating they were out completely.
They had previous TR1'nd on Monday say they had 9,841,131 left.
So they have managed to shift that many there over the last few days.
Not in there so not sure of normal volumes .

Sorry, but I think we're full up now. :)

Answering my own question, I guess they would have to, being a public body.
But I assume their decision only a recommendation?

On a similar theme, I did wonder if DAERA's decision would be made public before it was handed off to the Minister.
So as not to put the onus on him alone.

Not with II, oh son of the piper.
But if you PM me your details I'll give it a go. ;)
Sorry. Taxi....

As Tango picked up on this morning, Killik's sell off was actually last month, 12th of May.
Around one of the last spikes to .44p funnily enough.
Then the date on which Infa were notified was the 15th of this month.
Okay, so Infa can't dictate when an ii informs them ,but why over a weeks delay in RNSing it to shareholders.
Also, on the RNS it states, " Total number of voting rights of issuer as 152,704,300"
Now I know that we have not had that many shares in issue since early 2015.
Wish we still did, tbh. :)
Anyhoo, what's the dealio? RNS resposible Infa personage.

Thanks, TTNY.
Yes, I can see your valid reasons for your correspondence and was aware that you are somewhat local so had no issue with your email. Just didn't like the idea of loads of shareholders doing similar with no other reason other than profit.
Even as a LTH I have a healthy regard for the worries that, for want of a better term, the anti's, have regarding their beloved IM.
Have said before that I live in a very similar area (ANOB, SSSI) so understand their issues with protecting their environment.
Just hoped that things could be done in a way that had least inpact and went as far as possible to appease all concerned.
Tricky, yes. But as you both point out, the bennefits to the local economy would go a long way to mittigate such impact.
If done correctly.
I did come up with a solution, kind of thinking outside the box. :)
We buy a couple of old tankers, but in good nick. Pump the brine into them and when one is full just pootle out a safe distance and slowly disperse the brine over a wider area whilst the other is filling up. Then on the way back fill up with fresh sea water for injecting into the caverns. Couple of big tanks onshore for the surplus.
Then I thought when/if the FSRU was up and running the empty gas tankers could fill up and empty on their homeward journey. Genius.
JW, I expect royalties if you use this method. ;)
Keep 'em rolling

" So what's the end game, Cathal ? "
" To make shed loads of money! "
That'll do, pig. :)

The decision to bail out may be taken for you if the company is sold, further down the line.
More intriguing,Nick, are you saying you're hung like a donkey or a carrot.? ;)

Personally, and I may be unpopular for saying so, I'm not sure that inundating the ministers inbox with emails, at this late stage is such a good idea. Regardless of good intentions. The time for that was during the PC, IMO.
And telegraphing the proposal to those in opposition is just going to make it worse.
He'll need a bigger inbox. :)
I'm sure he's fully aware of the pro's and con's of the situation and if not he's not doing his job right, no disrespect.
Also, and no offence, but I can't believe that everyone was not aware of the fact that the buck stops with him. It's been discussed here many times over the last six months.
Even though I was aware he's the environment minister I just had a quick google of the man.
As it happends, just this afternoon he announces £800k of grants for projects to help DAERA’s strategic aims.
So he's obviously beeing seen to be doing right by thing as per his post.
Anyhoo, this all sounds a bit negative, not my intention. I even bought a load yesterday, bouyed by the arrival of the viking ships. Pun intended. :)
I just think that a load of emails from "shareholders" is not a good idea, just sayin'.
From locals, for or against, yes of course.
Just my thoughts, fwiw.
Regards, Si. (tin hat on)