Member Info for Si_Derman

But he's a liar and I'm not sure about you.
Sorry BP, couldn't resist. ;)
Not castin' nasturtions.

Lol. Ask your freind if the lady used the term "dreckly" in relation to this "work"., Nobby. :)
Local parlance for an unspecified period of time. Somwhere between tomorrow and never. But soon.

Trying hard to resist what must be "international start your own thread day", i have to come clean and inform everyone that I already know the conclusion of the results. They will be; Holders 1 (read as won) = Non-holders nil. :)

Not good, tbh.
Unfortunately, 50% down means a 100% rise to get back there.
There is also an element of deja vu about this.
Two charts.
1. https://invst.ly/v2nzn
2. https://invst.ly/v2o2v
Both show a similar fall to 27, although one from a bit higher.
Both included placings at 30 not long after the high.
Difference being, one was to fund a purchase of assets and the other was to fund a contract.
Oh, and there was a consolidation of 100:1 between them.
Without looking at the dates it would be hard to know which was which.
Someone deserves another bonus I think. NOT.

Have wondered about that for quite some time, Spud.
More intriguing than one of Chitta's theories. :)

That's interesting. That first document , "The Navy: purpose and procurement " is witnessed by one Micheal Vidal.
Now, there is a frequent poster on the Infa Twitter feed of that same name.
Coincidence?
Seems to like Line of Duty. ???

I think the bit that says," for the time being" was my cue to stop trying to figure it out and wait till it's finalised. :)

I believe that the 5000 refers to the original feed funding amount of £5000 that the five mentioned on the satement put in.
So it's now 5000 shares at £1 each. IMO

Regardless of who you use to buy your shares through, in your case Halifax, me Barclays, you are automatically entered on to the register of shareholders of OO and entitled to all the benefits that coming down the line.

Not many get the timing just right, Lauders. Important thing is you are in and holding. imo :)
I do hope that you get the chance to lower your average at some point. Whether you get the low 30's remains to be seen.
But, preferably, when you've bagged and take back your stake as profit. lol
I've been looking at the build-up over the last year to where we are at the present and have noticed a few things that may be of interest. Will post later.
And GL, yourself.
Si. :)

BTW, the bad translation and punctuation kinda makes quite normal. From what I've seen.

Well it's on the whatjobs website.
https://en-sg.whatjobs.com/finance-director-jobs

If news of the study, that should have just finished, pops up on Monday there's going to some that may have wished they had not sold for a few percent possible gain. IMO

Stokey, mostly for the reach I would imagine. They can swing things into position from elsewhere. Although they can both be on wheels/tracks a gantry may be able to carry a larger dead weight as its supported at both ends.
Just my thoughts, not a liftologist. :)
https://www.geograph.org.uk/stuff/list.php?label=Henson+Cranes&gridref=J3676

Apparently they have, but no one responded to their e-mails. ;)

118m x 33.5m

Anyhoo, I would have thought "Lil' yellow lifty thing", was more your kinda thing. ;)

Oops, that should be LeesaDee.
Now I'm for it. :)

What about LisaDee? lol

No, but Appledore built the Scillonian III in 1977.
The one that's being retired.
Watch out for JW getting the cheque book out again. There's a dry dock coming on the market. :)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-56955553