We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Still up 20% from recent lows by my simple reckoning. A bit of profit taking does constitute a P&D, even if you actually believed the quoted numbers and trade details. I've posted recently from personal experience how wrong they are.
Anyhoo, difficult doing this on a phone so will leave you to your fan club of stalkers.
Not quite sure of the reason behind the thread tbh, BT. Bit provocative, don't you think. Or is that the intent? A few chancers led by PD101, clues in the name with that one, spouting nonsense off the back of an RNS. Imagine most of those replying and agreeing with them were actually the same poster with multiple accounts or a little gang of them. Bet if you compared histories you would find similar tactis employed elsewhere with the same mery band of numpties. Didn't read any of it, fwiw. And those that were new, since last time they tried similar tactics, were very quickly banished to the verdant naughty step of doom, never to seen of again. :)
If people want to reply to such stuff that's up to them, some never learn that it just encourages them.
Waste of time, imo.
But as regards being a "classic" pump and dump. Erm, more your Austin Allegro kind of classic than a Aston Martin BDS, I would say.
Meant to add, could this latest batch just be in preparation for such an update. A bit of fluffing before the main event. :)
In of themsleves, yesterdays is not conclusive, as of yet. And todays, tbh, has potential but ain't a massive amount.
Have to wait and see I guess.
Nice rise first thing but looking a little droopy atm.
But enough of my problems ;)
GLA
Certainly due some sort of company wide update if they want an excuse to make it three RNS's in a row. Call it what you will, a Business Update, a Trading update... I dont' mind, just be nice to get something out to address some of the many unanswered questions left hanging since the last serious communication. It's one thing having a splatter gun approach to their business ventures, but at some point they do need to provided a progress report on all these various markets they have entered, or have suggested that they are entering.
Stokey, whilst I agree that any equity raise would garner very little in funds at this level . At a premium, err, maybe. But even then, the amounts derived from such an exercise would be meaningless compared to what they actually need. It would also mean that the much touted financing excerise has failed, if they were going down that road. It would also require some kind of huge carrot to dangle to prospective buyers. And all they normally want is an actual discount or vast numbers of warrants. So, no can't see one being done at a premium. He's done a double before, but a triple the issue would be big, even for JW.
And as regards JW not wishing to dilute his own shareholding. Wouldn't bother him in the slightest. IMVH and HO.
His percentage holdings have, I beleive, gone down over time, not up.
H9, as fun as it must be for you to poke the bulls from over the fence. Curious what the end game is for you? Or even if you have one. You, like everyone else, have had the chance to buy back in at a reasonable discount of late and have not shown, publicly at least, for that to be the case. Have you just decided that you are going to stick around and offer "balance"?
Or are you waiting for "certain things" to be sorted first. Genuinely interested, fwiw.
Not taking the P, btw. If I wasn't interested you would be in the sin bin with all the nutters, rampers and the down right unpleasant scumbags.
... and just check on some of the back histories of the latest batch of new posters, before trying to reason with them. Some are so obviously second accounts, some even freshly made.I find it amazing just how many green boxes you can get in one thread without even reaching for the filter button. Must have had previous experience of some. Going to add a few more I think. Enjoy the ramptastic posts. :)
Well, with the day chart complete, barring any late reported trades, after that late afternoon rally the body of todays candle certainly broke through that long term down trend we've been watching for so long, Lottie. And not just the tip this time. :)
https://invst.ly/13tvin
Just about touched the 200dma.
As always, fwiw, but here's the full longer term view.
https://invst.ly/13tvxp
This one is on the 4hr, otherwise the daily charts go a bit out of scale because of the consolidation a while back. The 2p, as it was, looks like £2 and people start getting over excited. Can't have that now. :)
Just my take on it.
Not going to make any predictions. Leave that for the individual to interpret. It's just for reference.
GLA
Not sure about the bit from the proactive article saying that this news is a welcome development after having the bid for the SSC rejected. Yeah, I'm not really sure everyone was so gutted about the rejection. lol
Indeed, Syn. Very good tune choice. Been busy most the day and just thought I'ld see how it's going. Nice to be able to relax and kick back a bit after this morning news.
Re. chart and that long term trend, Lottie. Well, it certainly broke through on the intra-day. But it was only the tip, and only for a short time. Ooh, err! ;)
As i'm typing I can see it's having another rally so lets see, end of day, when the full days chart is complete.
GLA
Stokey, for clarity, apres caffine, I was not suggesting it would qualify for funding. I was merely pointing out that the "client" for this contract, effectively the UK Gov., are one and the same as the ones guaranteeing the proposed loan. And NOT that this contract would qualify. BUT, it would be odd to award , or even give preferred bidder status, to such a contract if they thought that the company could not be in a position to fulfill it in the alotted time frame. They, the uk gov., would also likely to know when stage payments for the FFS would be rolling out. AND, if such payments would negate the need for the loan at all. So, the jury is still out, afaic, on this loan.
And yes in days gone by I would have been expecting, "other news", to follow.
Just think outside the green box.
GLA
Might have the resources, staffing levels and good experience in pontoon manufacture, Xenor. But we still have the same man at the top. The Falklands are still a British overseas territory, albeit a self-governing one. So is this efectivly another job from the UK government. To the tune of over half the expected loan ammount. So re they both the client and the guarantor of the loan?
As long as it's a SeaRose type further announcement and not one one further announcements that never happen. A multi-year contract, five times the Mcap, should have a good uplift here. Still, have that old war wound type of twinge though.
If you know what I mean. :)
Bit of background on the FIPASS.
https://www.atlink.co.fk/about-us/fipass/
Pontoons R Us.
It wouldn't be hard to imagine that the whole takeover malarkey was done knowing that it would have held things up. Going by what he said about it stalling the contract singing. Regardless of if there was ever an actual commitment on the part of H&W to proceed with the takeover, it certainly held things up for a while. Time will tell if the delay causes any issues down the line.