Member Info for semaphorRed

"This is Stockies post back in May regarding the Leandra V and we all know what a load of bull that turned out to be. So now its Panamas turn to get the Stocky treatment."

If it's personal research and clearly labelled as guesswork, there's nothing wrong with it. People can take it or leave it. If something isn't in an RNS the chances are it'll be incorrect but as long as it's not labelled as fact it's probably beneficial or at least of interest to this board.

"The market isn't very 'wide' for QED, must be about 75% private shareholders, possibly more. I bet we've got 60% reading this board!"

Probably more, and most importantly the "liquid" market - the amount of the shareholding that is likely to be traded in any one day is absolutely minute. The vast, vast majority of shares here are in long term hold - both from the comments about people being long term holders and the tiny daily volume - even when there's news, the percentage of the 2 billion shares that are traded is almost nothing. So yeah, there's basically no "wider market" - and the fact that people don't really know about us keeps the share price artificially depressed.

Https://tinyurl.com/Quaddie16273

I'm not sure if this was shared here, it's from earlier this week

"Unfortunately it evidences they are not in control"

I didn't ever believe they were in control of when the counterparty would sign the contract. And yeah, their timescale guesses (which is what they were) have always been unreliable/overly optimistic. But I'm guessing what is happening now is what was happening in 2024 - the Cargill lawyers are going back and forth refining the contract and it's taking forever.

How can we get you inspired darling?

"I’m not sure we will see things develop in Q3 though given the massive disappointment of Q2"

You think a contract not being finalised in Q2 means it has *less* chance of being finalised in Q3?

"Interesting in this RNS that they added the last paragraph this time stating that their holding has hugely increased as a result of them both actioning their options."

Either they've been reading the board or, more likely, one or more people on this board have emailed IR asking for clarification/berating the directors, so they've clarified. Hope it'll shut up the people on here who claimed JM had sold out

"Some would be happy with that."

Shhh! Stick with the narrative!

46G, why are you posting this AI slop? We all have access to this rubbish

If I gave you 5 million shares for your birthday, your exposure would increase by 5million x share price.

"He exercised options at 1p and sold off a load to pay for the options, resulting in no increased exposure."

His exposure increased by c. 5 million shares. It's shocking how many people here invest in the stock market but fail to understand something so simple.

"Barking 100% correct they need to communicate actual progress"

No, they need to *have* actual progress. Their communication is fine, it's the progress we need.

"Any ideas why the SP closed higher than the ASK price ?"

Please get your information from the London Stock Exchange website. If the data isn't there, please don't rely on it.

*Corporate Governance Code is more flexible and allows the Chairman to temporarily take on some executive functions, and that's what's happening here.

With bigger UK companies, this is not allowed. With smaller companies, the UK corpor8gov

"How do know nothing is happening? You’re guessing….

Your normal tactics….to suit your agenda."

If nothing was happening it would mean Cargill/MSC had walked away from the deal. This would be RNSable and probably also a breach of contract. Things are progressing behind the scenes. More slowly than we'd like.

"4 months ago the man in the know said everything in the below list would have commenced by now?"

Source please. Quadrise, as a contract counterparty, has as much control over when a contract will be signed by the opposing counterparty as in any contract. That is, none.

Yes, clearly this, like all shares, is purchased by retail investors via brokers and held in nominee accounts and this is what this AI article has counted.

But some, Kurlyboy, are more equal than others

This is a clear and obvious lie Jackg. All the updates were genuine and in accordance with the law. You are making unfounded claims of gross illegality against the company and I think you should leave before you land yourself in trouble.

"Just under 99% in funding rounds and just over 1% in revenue"

Well, it's a pre-revenue company. If we'd raised millions of pounds in revenue we'd be at 80p or so.