Member Info for semaphorRed

Credit where credit is due StockCheque

"And the only positive is a sparkler"

We've only ever needed one.

But, it's what I (and many) said about contract back and forth taking longer than expected, as they have before, without any negative connofafio.

There's no way the conversation could've legally led to any substantive information unfortunately.

"when you probably new the answers?"

He knows nothing that you don't know.

"Wtf"

100%

"It’s amusing how some people think investing is static, as if once you buy shares..."

Also, amusingly, it allows me to pinpoint when the person is referring to - since the last time I had that specific number of shares was in the summer of 2018. So my single post has been living rent free in his head for 7 years. How embarrassing.

"StockCheque..Filtered number 65"

Thanks for letting us know. You must be proud of your collection, I wonder who's left.

"but there's always a tone of smug superiority and condescencion in your reply..rather than educate you try to drive your point home..well done you.."

People repeatedly coming into a board and lying about the fundamentals of the stock market is dangerous. I'm not condescending - I'm frustrated. It happens almost every day, people talking about a market maker tree shake or some other nonsense - and yeah, I can either spend more time rebutting again or again or I can just leave this nonsense alone for people to read and believe.

"Anybody who needs tell people how many shares they have"

I've probably done this once, maybe twice in years and thousands of posts - I'm far from the only one and certainly not the most recent but you've obviously kept this front of mind - down to the specific share number (!) - for what might be almost a decade (considering how out of date the number is). That plus your repeated using of a prior username, as if this somehow proves something, is pretty disturbing behaviour. It seems you're taking things incredibly personally.

"peddled your own BS" - "don't offer a opinion"

It's either one or the other. And I do offer opinions, nearly daily - but no, I don't go out and research ship locations or power station operations. You got me.

"Anybody who needs tell people how many shares they have...well thats as shallow as they come"

It's really not. We're *shareholders* and - while I haven't announced my shareholding in many years - the number of shares people own is relevant. If someone is on this board having put £100 in a few months ago, it isn't the same as people who've put their financial health on the line for decades.

"Noticed something about you INDIGO"

Firstly, nice and calm now. You don't think that's my real name or that you've discovered I've had more than one username on a forum do you? I've got news for you, in the last decade there's been more than two.

"( I Have 3.8 Million shares)"

You keep mentioning that too. Must be from quite a while ago, though I don't know when I mentioned it. I'm afraid it's significantly more now.

"the inadequacy of people who don't understand trading or how the market works"

Not the inadequacy of people. The inadequacy of certain aspects of their understanding of parts of the market. For example, that there's a massive market maker conspiracy or that the Quadrise board have, for nearly two decades, been committing criminal insider trading. That sort of thing.

"you always REBUT people arguments or concerns.

I've never once whether here or on the forum see you offer an original idea, piece of research , opinion on anything technical ...just Rebut, ridicule pick apart anybodies argument."

But that's what a rebuttal *is* - there isn't anything actually completely original (have a look at scientific papers and the references at the back, and I'd caution that if you see anything too original in the public domain that didn't come from the company, it's probably nonsense.

It's not just that you've spent thousands of hours on here generating countless post *all of which* have been both boring and useless. It's that you've obviously invested more than you can afford to lose, hoping for a quick buck and are letting this share consume your every waking moment because of it and it's just so sad and depressing to watch.

"Lies about 'investing inheritance money' and inventing 'dead relatives' has to be the utter pits even by the already lowest-of-the-low ramper standard."

Unless investing inheritance money is a lie. Can't see why it would be, it's hardly rare or exceptional to do so.

"What evidence do you have that something tangible is happeming with one of our projects ?"

None, same as you - because "evidence" is only found in RNSs so your assumption that any time between RNSs nothing is happening because they haven't released an RNS is a logical failure.

"SR..In that case please provide me with some evidence something tangible is happening with a project right now.Maybe i missed something."

Do you believe that "things happen" in companies only on days when an RNS is released? And between those days "nothing happens"?

"but nothing is happening."

HF14 - this line of comment is now becoming extremely tired. It's not true, you know it's not true, yet you keep on.

1st October last year the share price was 1.35p

I'm betting we're going to see the biggest one year share price uplifts in the entire AIM market come 1st October this year.

If - on what is exactly the same news/facts on the ground, this was a buy at 6p, then with a 3 months delay (which I expect on EVERY announcement, if not more) it must be that much more of a buy in the 3ps

"LSE doesn’t say which one"

Nor do they ever. Once again, check out the Quadrise page on the London Stock Exchange for trade information.

"Residue isn't low cost by product...it has its own market for sale."

Residue is, obviously, a low cost byproduct and also has a market so it can be sold. The reason why these massive ships use HFO is because it's so cheap relative to essentially any other fuel by energy density and the reason why it's cheap is because of its status as a refinery byproduct.

"I shudder to think who much money might be in my pension and ISAs now if I'd gone down other investing pathways rather than having a significant percentage of it wrapped up in QED all that time"

Yep, the big difference between having invested in Quadrise and basically any other pre-commercial AIM penny share is that it's still around and you didn't write it off a forget about it a decade ago.

"I'm sure it could have been better worded."

Agreed. So what we know about this company, with cast iron certainty is that - even when it doesn't help them - they're immediately and brutally honest.

"In my view this should never has been said. Knowing how frustrated most of us are, why throw this into the mix."

Only because I specifically asked the question.