Member Info for semaphorRed

AKHM: it's also important to note/understand that an RNS is a carefully checked legal document. They can't say "continues to progress" or that contracts are "now in near-final form" if this isn't really happening and actual progress - able to be evidenced in court if required - wasn't occurring.

Fyoz: is it just me or does the RNS describe exclusively positive material progress on all fronts? Everything is "Q3" but Q3 begins in just over 2 weeks. Some people on this board seem a bit strange.

Meh. I thought the RNS was really positive. Maybe I read a different one.

"Although frustrating is an understatement"

Frustration is always due to the simple lack of information update which sets the mind wondering and the brain on edge. Often, of course, an update simply isn't due, but this doesn't help all of us sitting here twiddling our thumbs and nervously waiting. None was worse than through the vast majority of 2024 and although we were rewarded by the most significant and positive result possible, we can almost be said to be still carrying trauma from that year. I dont believe we're due or overdue an update now but boy would I like one.

"On past history, your signing 'a commercial contract' remains meaningless until the supply end actually goes fully commercial"

That what a commercial contract is

"local ones only"

Round the corner from me there's an ice bucket deal of 5 little bottles for €5 with a bag of crisps. So...beers are on me.

"i predict if the trial goes to plan and not delayed as such to another year we see large fluctuations and finish around 10- 12p year end"

So, for me I can't imagine it would be that low considering that we were at 8p in pretty much exactly the same situation as we are in now. If the trial goes to plan, and there's no reason to suggest that it won't, we will be looking at a successfully finished fuel test with the world's biggest commodity trader and the world's biggest shipper for a suite of fuels which they are now almost legally mandated to use as well as being able to use without expensive and time consuming retrofitting of their fleet as well as immediately saving money while complying with regulations. In other words a complete no-brainer.

And that's not the end of it either. We've got Utah and Panama and even maybe Morocco, all of which we can expect material progress by the end of this year. And again we had 8p where we are now. If we reach the end of this year with substantial progress in Utah, Panama and Morocco and a completed LONO trial, I think we're basically done - we're a commercial company with commercial valuations and a PE ratio that will take into account global shipping fleets, industrial cement kiln and power plants.

"What share price does everyone need to hit to make a £1,000,000 ?"

There will be people who have more than £1M now. It's not very important because it depends how many shares you hold, what you bought them for (of course) and also, £1M (profit) might be more for some than others. Certainly it's not an psychological number I have in my head. I've held my shares for a long time though, and I expect genuinely big things from them by the end of the year.

"Would anyone be kind enough to give me a very brief - idiots level - run down of best/worse case possibilities for say the coming six months."

Check the Reddit sub. Search via google

"Stockcheque was you indigo?"

No

"SemaphorRed that very definitive of you"

Agreed.

"which looks likelier by the day"

Does it? They've got 5 seats out of 650. For comparison the Lib Dems have 72. There's zero chance Reform will "get in". Zero.

The_adams has been a member here since 2017 and every post he's made has been on the Quadrise board, none of them positive. So, the_adams, do you own stock here and if so, why?

"Deviation from Official Channels: Material information about a publicly traded company, such as the commencement"

ChatGPT? 😂

But sure, nothing new will appear here first. Although a company can release sensitive information through other channels like a public interview.

I mean, that sort of cost is why we're in the game - MSC probably burns 20 million metric tons of HFO a year across their fleet, at a cost of 400-500 USD per ton (depending on location, quality, time). So an $8bn+ annual fuel bill. From just MSC.

9 months at sea burning HFO would cost anywhere from 12 to 30 million dollars (depending on speed, hours and loads of other factors).

Once again readers of this board have to be so incredibly careful. This isn't a situation where people have strange opinions but rather where they are presenting significant lies as fact. There's a huge problem here

"This was always the post he was going to fulfill."

It is one more piece in the "blue chip" puzzle Jason mentioned, as Quadrise transitions from an R&D start-up to a fully fledged supplier.

"privately considered ... that the decision is perhaps an advance warning that at projects are seriously delayed or even worse"

No, I don't see how the two could be logically connected I'm afraid.

"the fact is he did not deliver as a CEO"

But he did. He took us from nothing to the fattest pipeline we've ever had, binding contracts with the biggest names, and a suite of new products that work together to conform to a legally mandated emissions pathway.