Member Info for semaphorRed

Come on Vince, chin up!

Boring!

80%. If the US starts making threats it'll probably collapse but otherwise it'll pass.

Please remember (or look back at his earlier posts) that the_adams has been previously shown to be a bad faith operator on this board.

"agree.The format of the Q&A is an insult to shareholders"

Everything must be an insult to you. I hope they didn't spend more than 5 minutes on this nonsense, they are trying to progress a company here. Everyday you become more and more a clown

"Just been to the races"

How'd it go?

" I won big! "

But... Your horse didn't even finish!

"No, but I've a bungalow in Dorset that's doubles in price over the last 20 years, so all in all I'm ahead"

This makes no sense, we're not talking about your bungalow, we were discussing horses!

"Monsoon..they have previously given timelines when publishing prior year results and updates."

Under a different CEO dingbat. All of Monsoon's post is correct. I know I'm filtered but wouldn't expect you to open your mind an inch anyway so this is for everyone else.

"SC Still struggling to work out how you bought loads of shares at nil cost"

It's like mystic meg. You nod, smile, and don't look too closely.

Just a couple of points before I duck out

1. Previously expired options have been replaced for those with a higher strike price and slightly more of them which is an undeniably positive sign. Moreover this is the programmatic manner by which insiders like board members most commonly purchased shares in the company.

2. This is an anonymous board. Not only doesn't it matter whether someone has bought or sold shares, but we don't know whether they have actually done this nor even whether they hold shares at all. Take care online folks!

This further aligns the interests of the directors with the performance of the company. The options will not strike without significant commercial progress.

"Peter has until the new year to get this constipation moved, if not I'm reducing my holding by a full magnitude."

Well, sure, but it's important to be realistic. Under the assumption Peter is " perfect", the world's finest CEO, its best negotiator and leader, how much could he potentially get done from a standing start in under 3 months? Something? Yeah, probably, but he's in the mercy of a pipeline of a type he didn't create. That's not to say he won't succeed but putting an arbitrary time limit on it of 10 weeks (it's not like that's when we run out of money or anything) hurts you more than anyone else.

In some ways we've been as patient as monks. In other ways, with what Quadrise is trying to accomplish, what did we expect? If we succeed we open the door to displacing global HFO usage: our product is better by every metric. If we didn't expect that to be an grievously uphill battle, we should have.

Yeah Willswag, it's really important to note that because we're a technology company and can scale rapidly at next to no cost to use, combined with an almost infinite potential market, we benefit from the very highest PE ratios given to other small technology companies. However there are lots of tech companies that actually do have scale costs - openAI is still loss making due to data centre costs - where we have a licensing model which means that once the ball is rolling, third parties will source, produce and distribute our product for us, hence the stellar likely PE ratios at play. In some ways we're like a newborn Coca Cola - we have a secret recipe and you can go open a bottling plant in your own market at your own expense, and then find distribution, and just pay us the royalty.

I don't think a market cap of 1bn is very much at all. The market looks at what's been done so far and what more could be done in future based on the potential market. Once we've got revenue, especially if it's from more than one source - even if the revenue is small, the first part of the question has been answered. Much of the market prefers a company that is making money from only a tiny fraction of their potential market so it has as much room as possible for future growth. Making deep and stable inroads to marine and power, especially if it's different companies, different feedstocks and different parts of the world, and the fact we have the potential to expand and low or zero cost to ourselves, we can tunnel through the 10bn and 50bn mark with ease.

It's just hard to imagine because we're all psychologically biased - we've been pre-commercial and thus, pre-success for so many years and overjoyed with a 10p share price, we often can't see beyond that.

"Wasted energy researching Leandra movements before agreements signed."

And, let's be honest, after.

If he got weirdly lucky once in those ten thousand posts we're potentially sitting on a gold mine! Now, just need to find that one post...

"The only info worth anything here is the RNS"

Ha! True enough, but the same can be said for your posts and mine.

"I am 100% sure I won’t miss a thing"

You probably will at that. It's 50 posts a day and half are irrelevant. Then you've got HF14 with only 1 post a day, all arenonsense.

Yachts of this type take 18-36 months to build.

It's not the amount that's in question, it's the quality. Road use can be any quality. They're still refining the process for quality extraction.

I don't have anyone on filter anymore. I just can't be reading more than one paragraph per post. Feels too much like work