Death by spreadsheet…12 Aug 2022 12:54
I’ve updated my spreadsheets for H2 2021 and H1 2022, tweaking the PGM split so that the estimated basket price better fits with the reported number from H2 2021. The Rhodium % has been slightly increased to reflect the higher Rhodium content from the Eastern Limb and Palladium decreased by the same amount.
H2 2021: https://tinyurl.com/msdcfxd9
H1 2022: https://tinyurl.com/37p5v2wy
Some interesting things jump out:
From H2 2021, it looks like the 6000 ‘in-process’ ounces were sold off pretty much at cost, with all of the earnings coming from the fully processed ounces. To me that makes the performance more impressive than it might have seemed at the time. The extra ounces were there essentially just to make up the numbers.
From H1 2022, I applied the same revised PGM split and just updated the average PGM prices. You can see that there is a large discrepancy between estimated and reported earnings, of almost US$11.5 million. As I mentioned previously, I believe this might be due to more ‘in-process’ ounces being sold off during the Inyoni ramp up. Can anyone think of another explaination? If this is the case then we should expect much improved numbers in future.
Also, based on the cobalt revenue and price at the time, I estimate they must have sold approximately 7 tonnes… not bad considering this was just from testing.
Another thing to note, I believe the transport costs are ‘per ounce’, ie, they should be applied to all ounces, not just a percentage coming from the Eastern Limb. If you take total transport cost and divide that by the quoted Cost / ounce the number is slightly larger than the total PGM ounces produced.