RE: Next hearing14 Jan 2019 00:17
Oopsi,I have been reading it over and over to get a complete reading of it.I know what you mean.as is often the case with rns ,it is not clear .to me the wording is odd.it doesnt say the next appeal but ,the rns was in relation to the injunction case.it says frr intend to appeal so hadnt at that point.but we have no listing so far for the appeal so it is fair to assume that the injunction is in place till 17.of course it may be extended if a later court sitting is required.the court saw grounds to re apply the injunction and the rns doesnt state that it is on the grounds of appeal.it is an easy assumption though.it would infer that the injunction is linked to the fiduciary ,damages claim though.so you could assume that a determination on that would precede lifting theninjuction,otherwise why re apply it.