Member Info for Scotty77

agree this accounting exercise was necessary to clear the decks and get the position clear. My only concern now is whether we get another hit when the next tranche of shares are issued for the icm deal. I hope this is already priced in.. beyond this we should only be seeing positive info going forward.

on LSE :-

http://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/205501/minds-machines-in-discussions-with-leading-ethereum-wallet-as-it-updates-on-roll-out-of-luxe-domain-205501.html

It seems the last sentience is being read by the market as a profits warning yet the statement before seem like a contradiction to me. This needs some clarification.

"those properties launched in China in Q3 (ie. .law and .gowou) and the forthcoming launch of .luxe, lead management to remain cautiously optimistic about the full year operating EBITDA and the wider opportunities ahead. However, a slow-down in high value one-off sales is likely to impact top-line revenue"

what the deferred revenue ($9.5 million) from ICM was for. This is issued as a liability for us at the moment. This contributes to the overall appearance of a bigger debt..

something why such a negative reaction ? On the face of it there doesn't appear to be any massive sales either unless there on the books and pending ?

does follow with sells.. its no wonder this cant get out of the starting blocks.. possibly a few over exposed and averaged down and need a little back on every little recovery

for Toby's announcement on Friday ?

I only see it here https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/stocks/summary/company-summary/VGG614091012GBGBXASQ1.html?lang=en

sorry if this has already been discussed but did this RNS "Notice of Interim Results 12 Sep 2018" not appear on LSE ?

he is a shareholder like any of us (albeit substantially more invested) so why would he not seek out a BB of other shareholders?

And for the record I am also of the belief this has huge potential especially given the recent blockchain news and I am here for future divis... which will be a first for me in AIM listed stock.

SB, being a complete sceptic I assume that a sell order was placed at a given price (and this is where my conspiracy theories get really silly) the MMs who are pals with various institutions or members of, agree to complete the order but know that there is no current uptake hence the sudden increase in price. All those who believe this is undervalued and believe this maybe the re-rate, we expect and hope for, start jumping in buying up the aforementioned sell order.

The MMS clear the decks and take their commission\spread etc and down we go. Wiping out all the stops from the new punters on the way down.

Obviously I don't know any of this but it doesn't feel like share value movement, rather more like make a quick buck from the unsuspecting ...

Market manipulation is a deliberate attempt to interfere with the free and fair operation of the market and create artificial, false or misleading appearances with respect to the price of, or market for, a product, security, commodity or currency.

It seems to me that what went on a few backs to complete the sell order was the definition of the above. On the 15 Aug there was the RNS that outlined investment in TLDs which I suspect would be used as the reasoning for the rise but we clearly saw a large sell order filled shortly after. So yes I believe this is tantamount to manipulation given the price since has tumbled back..

Anyone care to predict the kind of dividends we could expect if they do come online within the next year.

12 shares ?

7.62 to buy 7.5 sell

getting hit this morning, Doesn't change all the positives about this stocks

Hopefully the SP will stand up to the days traders jumping out after the recent rise.

other rubbish on AIM on the rise today with no profit and risky futures. Makes me laugh when you see such little movements on shares like this with positive news and genuine positive numbers.

this could catch on very quickly. There are so many businesses and start-ups now looking at how to monetise blockchain and this is definitely a step in the right direction. Once word gets about we could see a real take up as people wont want to miss out on owning the correct blockchain tld. Fingers crossed..