RE: Quick question13 Nov 2025 10:05
Completely agree HXUL. I am long the stock for a material amount thus will always be a bit biased due to my long position. Basic investing psychology I guess. So it does make sense to focus on the material tail risks. So what are the main tail risks. 1) Nigeria receivables dont get paid or get delayed for a very long time 2) Chad arbitration yields no results 3) production issues arise and we eat up cash 4) discrepancies appear in accounts, investors lose faith in accounts, potential fraud issues arise etc
No. 4 would obviously be very negative, but I think the work SAVE have done obtaining world bank guarantees, securing new and large banking facilities, completing material acquisitions, would have entailed huge amounts of due diligence from various counterparties, and does give me confidence that numbers are good. Yes, all these acquisitions, and additional business complexities have likely lead to a deterioration in accounting controls which have not kept up with biz developments but hopefully these issues can be addressed.
As for all the other tail risks, I think SAVE can survive those. Its net debt/ EBITDA is only 3.1x . Cash at Sep was over $100m. There doesnt seem to be any huge looming debt maturities, with the accugas USD facility refinancing almost complete. Also cash collections have improved materially, so even we dont get a huge receivable paydown, the overall number should continue to fall. SAVE's core gas biz has a material market share in Nigeria and remains important to the country, and this remains a strong positive.
So you might be saying, "here he goes again with all his biased positivity", but did think it made sense to share my thoughts.