Member Info for Scinv_temp

*likely instead of "like"

Actually AI can help educate rational people. But you will learn nothing if your prompt is "XXX drug of my favourite company is the best one in the world and YYY big pharma just had a failed trial in the same field, how like are they to buy XXX drug?"

*NOT AI, MO

Exactly well said. Not that anyone rational needed that to understand the hypocricy here. I am not sure that some of the "warriors" here even have shares, who treats their money like that?

Never trust people with no shame...

Correction, under 0.5p

Zebbo, I don't know but it is certainly a huge red flag that he has been relentlesly pumping TLY at 25p then 10p and it is now under 1p

At 50% down it was an obvious buy except for fools and lunatics

My opinion. Every time you pump this with nonsense that never amounts to anything, confidence in the company drops. Even amongst yourselves. Let the data speak for itself, whenever it may come and stop shooting yourselves in the foot. Science is all that matters.

BTW, I did insist to save those dividends for a rainy day or to advance the business, but everyone thought I was deramper at the time...

A shame, but not entirely unexpected, given the situation that affects many biotechs.

That said, I think the current mcap is lower than cash at hand and remaining commitments from the rest of the clients, though I haven't followed this for over a year.

If I hadn't decided to stay away from aim at least for the time being, I probably would have bought some now.

Good luck guys.

Scientists follow the science and wannabe's the narratives :)

To be clear, it is more or less 18 months ago that I first bought, but my sells have been clearly stated, though I think it was only on the "other side".

WTP, there is a thing called watchlist you know. But worry not, as I believe by September I will have made the decision either to drop this stock from the list altogether or join back in. In the meantime, I insist that judging ones comments or presence in a forum by their declarations of shareholder status is a smart as a load of @@

I've confirmed that many times before and every time you act surprised as if this was a revelation lmao

Get real.

*may want

Not really, not soon anyway I think.

But that attitude that whoever doesn't hold shares is evil and out to get the company/investors is older than the dinosaurs and you want to consider an update to your views.

"The importance of our involvement with the NHS Cancer Vaccine Launch Pad and the fact that our prime minister commented directly about Scancell’s potential in the fight against melanoma cancer."

What is the importance other than faster recruitment for cohort 4? Re PM, did he comment on scancell?

Sure. What I'm saying is, "regular updates" says nothing about when a material update will take place.

Any project has fixed regular meetings can be as often as every week or two in co-development scenarios and twice per quarter or so in scenarios where there is just a research license for the partner to evaluate (this scenario). None of that means that news will come out at any given point. It's just business as usual.

"Scientist" lmao

Or do you have any doubt that the Sept 2023 RNS that they would have fully recruited scib1 by end of 2023 a straight lie? You can only fool me once, and even then it is only because I wasn't paying the attention I should have.