Member Info for Scinv_temp

Best one you can hope for is 1st patient dosed in cohort 4

100% not scinv's

Iscib1+ better 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Partnership to pay for phase 3 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Relevant results on modi (last one was 3/7) 🤣🤣🤣🤣

1. He asked why don't I invest when my own estimate says 20% chance of positive developments without realising that other factors are equally or more important.

2. He thinks just because online platforms offer FX trading, it's appropriate for retailers.

Tells ME all I need to know. Just because someone is a good professional in what they do and they me also understand other other tech (for example LLMs). That doesn't mean that are not fools here.

Yes time will tell, that's what I've been hearing for many many years from various people. Time has treated me well.

One last thing, being a loser or not relies on the method, not whether a calculated risk position goes south or not. And I already understood he relies on chance 99%. That's what makes a loser and not the outcome.

But you wouldn't get it🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

PS Simce you are not in those or similar fields, you have no business talk about FX trading that way 🤣🤣🤣

Oh and to answer your question:

SCIB1+: 0.5%

Modi: 5%

Glymab: 15%

Greenshaw after your AI post, which was excellent, I check your very recent post history (down to your recent post on brokers and fx trading and finally your "spectrum" one). I stopped reading the latter as soon as I saw "spectrum" because it was simply idiotic.

You or your friends in quantitative trading or structured investments risk management and the like may well be in the spectrum and do their job. Not in my case. I was a succesful scientist leading large multidisciplinary teams in drug discovery projects, turned business executive in the biotech sector a few years ago. So no, no spectrum here. I know EXACTLY what I'm talking about.

Funny thing, me a couple of friends from your field had a small fund during covid, I made most the profit by realising stuff go up like there is no tomorrow quickly. Had a good laugh watching them swear at spx for breaking all the ceilings. You guys are too drawn to your numbers sometimes 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Bestowed on? Wow that must mean it's really important. I would have used "Bestowed upon" but I get that some people are only here to deramp 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You know what, I'll be happy to know you are in the mood for a party by then. No hard feelings :)

Fortunately for you, it's personal. Because I built the initial bulk of my position thinking the trial would be fully recruited by Q1 2024 (see how reasonable I am? Added a full Q on the initial end of 2023 statement in the RNS). Then I realised that it would have been impossible but properly checking the actual start time and other things. This led to me being trapped and having to time additional buys until I exited the first time when the 72% was announced with a small (relative to the time/effort) profit. Then added again and exited 11.06 with another small profit.

But fooling me, and making me waste 2 years on this garbage, that comes at a price. To LD.

As for you lot, it depends. The smart ones benefit from my presence, the fools are hopeless anyway🤣

PS. That said, I don't currently plan to have more fun here beyond end of September, so hang in there :)

Like I said, a closed forum. Meaningless as usual even less so than the other one which was already garbage🤣🤣🤣

She got an award in a closed forum between friends 🤣

But no, the truth is scancell is grest and I'm just a bitter person, aren't I?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😛😛😛😛😛😛😛😛😛😛😛

"European awards" with UK brokers and investors mostly nominating AIM listed companies and some private UK or US listed but UK controlled companies. They didn't even have the decency to call them UK awards, what's wrong with that anyway?

🤣🤣🤣

Damn those beers :) still 5 fold, but 28 patients remaining instead of 30 :)

Correction: 15 patients recruited, and data on 11 patients at that time. Point still stands, 4fold off the mark, equivalent to saying 1 year and takes 4 years.

How about the "we will complete recruitment by end of 2023" with 13 patients recruited by end of September 2023 under the current protocol after more than 1 year of recruitment at that point, and another 30 needed to complete recruitment. Followed by a placing RNS 2 months later. Recruitment was actually completed end of 2024, more than a year later or about 5fold more time than originally suggested. Clear LIE. it would have been impossible even for the most influential companies in the world to do that.

By the way, is the pass mark 27 patients (63%) or 70% (30 patients) cause this was never clarified, causing poor chilltime a lot of trouble to the point that he disappeared 🤣🤣🤣🤣

What about that iscib1+ graph that shows that scib1 is USELESS in preclinical models. Was scib1 useless to begin with or is that graph wrong?

Many others too, but I don't expect you to understand, because you can't🤣🤣

Remember "banked" 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Oh really Chester, do you mean I have not proven to you that LD and the company have lied and misled you on several occasions? A simple yes or no will do. Time will come to discuss this properly.

It's obvious that you can't be saved 🤣

*they wouldn't want to unload