Member Info for Scinv_temp

Just a reminder that trial set target (primary endpoint) is 70% ORR. PFS is important but cannot declare final results for at least another year+. So the only primary endpoint final data that can be announced is ORR.

It is not an "industry standard" to make a separate company for a single asset and NOT call it spin off.

The industry standard is that a big company undertakes the lengthy, expensive and risky development work, in return giving a smaller but respectable share of the future value to the discovery company, as upfront and milestones/royalties. In this case, the company is GT, NOT scancell. So if anyone takes a chunk of GT, they will benefit from a deal like the one described above according to the %share in the company. The same goes for scancell, by the time the real money arrive (later milestones) they will get a chunk according to the % equity they have to GT at that time.

And you think redmile/vulpes/other fund will just say, "OK fine"?

Except they said that they need to develop sc134 before it realises its best value. That means investment to develop. And he replied they would make the pie bigger for everyone in response to whether current shareholders will be diluted in the new company.

Or maybe they underpromise and know they can overdeliver. But I don't bet on that.

They clearly said all IP and rights to gltmabs go to GT, so that's where all the milestone payments will go to.

The real question is, how will redmile get a chunk of GT, will they write off some CLNs + provide additional funds for GT? It could be a way for current shareholders to accept it without too much fuss. Relief (CLNs) + investment in GT that will bring value to the platform, in return for reduced control/equity in GT itself.

Days, probably before iscib1+ results are announced

Nope

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You mean step 1 to step 2. And the data must be so good that they decided to isolate the only platform with commercial potential from the rest.

Glymabs will create cash for GTx to develop sc134, and scancell will only hold a fraction of that.

No you have not seen the advantages and no it has not been proven to be better than standard of care. You need a controlled trial for that.

Tick tock

I will always have the same attitude towards those people, yes. All they want is to get investors, that have been almost destroyed by that scam, to buy even more shares from the new facility.

Who says I'm not making money? I even made some here. This is mostly infotainment to me. Keeps me sharp and it's fun

I speak negative for the aspects that are negative. It's not my fault that you and the fake scientist don't get it

And I don't do charting or any of that nonsense. My decisions are based on science and knowledge of the actual business side of science.

I've explained why I held until the 72% was announced, why I bought after it dropped below 10 and why the cvlp news was nonsense in the grant cheme of things and therefore sold again.

I've also explained why iscib1× is a dud on several occasions since 2 years ago. That graph they recently presented is GARBAGE in terms of comparing iscib1+ to scib1 (at the very least). But the loser scientist here never bothered to comment because he is trapped too.

You had the previous CEO sending lies to everyone about the "banked" results or RNSing how the trial would have been fully recruited by end of 2023 when it was impossible. You seem to imply that somehow you are experienced (🤣🤣🤣🤣) what does your business acumen tell you about that.

It is yout delusion that somehow I am delusional for being right AND explaining before hand why I am right AND my trades.

You are not fooling anyone, you are trapped like most of the other fools here and acting desperate. The truth is, you are a pathetic loser and a bully.

Tick tock

So you been pump and dumping this for 6 years, what does that prove?

Or you've been adding all these years (you are certainly super positive, I mean "perfect strategy", right?) Which means you are underwater for years, yet I'm delusional for making a profit here by predicting everything correctly?

At the next hint of recovery, when you sell. Will you tell everyone what you are really doing or is it ramp ramp ramp until you have no shares?

I expected nothing else than this particular stance. You can't fool anyone to buy your shares. You made a mistake. Own it.

Reasonabke post Bermuda. Then again there is not such thing as an investment without an estimation of how that developa over time. The idea that all is good and every other opinion ahould be dismissed is ridiculous and diahonest. Surely the hypocrisy is evident in one calling this a "perfect strategy" while arguing to those that have a different opinion that they "d9n't know", while themselves calling it "perfect" as if they know every little detail.

None of us really knows. Except it has become to me perfectly clear that no one here is more experienced than I am. Like it or not (not a comment for you Bermuda) that's how I think it is.

As Avidimab is far more suitable for mAbs than anything else. Though a perpetual, irrevocably license to GTx would suffice.

???

Hint: It also means that no one really wants to invest in the rest, as they would have taken that investment directly if that was the case.