Member Info for Scinv_temp

15 before the end of the week?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The larger companies that develop personalised vaccines also develop regular vaccines and can develop regular cancer vaccines. As for vaccination, you don't need to vaccinate for 100 different cancers, just the top 2-3/gender could result in huge reliefs to health systems and great benefits to the population.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

❄️🥶❄️

The smilies where because very obviously the link has nothing to do with scancell. But I should have expected you to put on the cheerleading bikinis and start dancing because you don't get it that you are really not fooling anyone 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂

Note that this shares a target with scib1 (gp100) except instead of using a whole antibody to be processed in order to present the epitopes to the immune system, it uses an engineered tcr that binds directly to gp100 on one end, and on the other it activates t-cells directly.

Not to compare, but to point out that there are different ways to the same goal, sometimes a lot simpler/easier ones to manufacture too.

The problem with it was cost. It seems they were expensive and their technology is almost as old as their target antigen. Regulators take that into account.

NIH also asked them to reduce the price by 91% as they previously ended up paying ca 750K per year of survival with certain quality of life with the price per dose at 21K.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK601810/table/t03/

It is amazing how many people still think that any will come good. SNG failed because the product is garbage and people lost a lot of money because SNG misled tham about the prospects and that is the con here, and not that TFG/whoever wants to be the sole beneficiary of any future success.

Ffs, the crime here is that sng management straight out lied to investors about the prospects of sng001 and you are worried about holding on to your shares?

😂😂😂😂😂

And all that for an insignificant paid article/marketing piece that is not even accurate (scancell did not identify any epitopes, they licensed them non exclusively from NIH).

😂

OH MY GOD. She nodded??

Then it must be true!!!!!

WE ARE RICH!!!!

/merrily running naked in the fields

😂😂

Sure you don't😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

What a bunch of clowns 🤣🤣🤣🤣

That's actually a great idea. ChatGpt is smarter than most here😛🥁

I mean, one has to respond proportionally...

CP is right! I have now filtered him as much as he has filtered me.

Apparently the linked in from the company itself and the entry in the AACR program are all distractions from the truth, unveiled by our very own Sherlock🤣

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣