Member Info for Scaffman

eh btree i know exactly how ass match works. and shareholders there are caught with no get out till sept.. so we will see what its like then. as to my remark about tough **** on shareholders yes-its called tough love and its what is currently needed atm against what seems a very over interested media in a 15m odd m cap co. applying for what dozens of other companies do on a regular basis. you seem quite happy about h+w fall however. strange behaviour from a supposed shareholder...

Well guys looks like the shareholders at IOSSC are having a bad time as well. 5.00 listed now 3.25 and going downhill fast. no divi's in a while or for the future,have used up all the cash they had, a poor bod and a Lab gov that should not give a tuppence about them. and they order another slow boat. I'll not even mention what the locals and the council think of them. oops I just did!

"It’s sad to see how feral this board has become both in relation to other companies and indeed fellow shareholders"

eh! this is probably the most stupid comment in a while "other companies" is mostly directed at the IOSSC with very good reason. Shareholders here and workers especially around Appledore are quite entitled to feel aggrieved when they see the picture of a beaming Stuart Fraser in front of 50 vietnamese workers whose direct benefit to the UK economy will be less than the purchase of a chicken sandwich ! as to comments about fellow shareholders eh no ! comments are in the most part; directed at a couple of nut jobs, some traders and some bitter ex-holders.

oh and I now see Heb doing what Heb does best, trying to redirect over to Adv.. lol

SHS How could they put it down as a Tory failure now when Labour have the exact same criteria to deal with and have the same decision to make that the Tories had. what has changed? nonsense.

Imo You cannot make an assumption that the market uses the media as its primary source for relevant information and the issuing of RNS is not affected by the company being in suspension and the Co have already stated they will keep the market informed via RNS whilst in suspension.

Bmondsey No and No

if this story came out whilst no suspension is in place then we would be looking at another dramatic drop. perhaps some posters should understand now why i have previously said that suspension should be kept in place until finance is totally resolved either with ukef or an other and tough **** on any shareholder that feels hard done by that they cant currently trade or access their funds.btw we have been here before with these news articles....

Lottie A good article and more than relevant. UK Gov could learn a thing or two from german's on how they support their companies.

Wyn 14:34 exactly. 😎 you wont get a look in...

Tony cannot even answer the most basic of questions. How could he have realized his money out of the gas storage the way the ML and court has gone. and how much longer will it take into the future.

p.s. there are quite a few women working in H+W just so you know..

Are the same Auditors in place then as now. The blame for this back in 22 was laid firmly at the door of the Auditors ability and backlog whether you or others choose to believe or not.. perhaps this should be asked at a.g.m. as much as anything else. regarding ned's I'm quite sure you and Lottie have a couple of names in mind...

Stokey Can you advise of the first late accounts filed when was this?

So much chatter on a weekend from a bunch of non-holders with the same never ending doom and gloom. We get it! We honestly do; but don't keep repeating the same speel please.

Penalties for late filing of accounts are minimal/nonexistent. Shares can be in suspension for up to 6 months, the company have issued non audited figs so we know where we are at there, so imo the board should just hold fire on doing anything else with Acc's and then issue all in conjunction with finance. If it takes a month from here so be it. Everyone happy...😊

(apart from shorters lol)

LSE I really don't see three FSS being enough with the shipbuilding needed and how they are going to be stretched to diff regions of the world. I can def see a 4th being added to the contract. With the design already done and H+W doing the first three could mean that a much bigger percentage will be saved on the 4th ship and in turn more work done in the UK without Navantia. win win.

Biffa 00:04

that's not what posters were anticipating. its old news and had already been brought onto the board. multiple posters are coming on with rehashes of the exact same story and with no new developments is a tad frustrating for holders... I do however take back my clown remark as it was unfair.

How embarrassing,ramping a suspended share. without providing a proper link, Biffa the clown would be more appropriate

Bubbles if you see a RNS in the morning; don't get too excited; its prob just the IM update...

Perhaps stokey chris or someone in tune with IM can give a new timeframe now for the procedures and decisions of the supreme court.

So back onto the IM merry go round we go !

also bearing in mind that Andrew Muir is Alliance, and Alliance's previous rep's for the larne area were very much "pro No gas caverns."

Just another rehash story. marybr-keeps both sides happy? care to elaborate what you're implying.?

I guess they want a monopoly on names as well now...😉