Member Info for Savage_KeyboardR

I have opted to take some profits here, I presume many will do given it'd net some a nice Christmas bonus!

My trade was this one here: 18-Dec-25 / 09:51:04 / 205.1307 / 1,100 / Buy / 204.80 / 205.40 / 2,256

Certainly is AimMaster2018 - Rather glad I did not opt to trim yesterday. Should be some more there yet too, what with the anticipated rate trim later on today by BoE!

MarcusExile - If you have evidence of a plausible 'buy' case then why not just put your case in a calm & decent manner?

Unfortunately, many posts you write contain profanities + aggressive language, which just makes you look like you're throwing your toys out the cot when things don't go your way?!

It's challenging to take you seriously when you behave so emotively. Look, if you've a decent point of view then it why not just stand on that - folks would then respect you for it, and you'd then be able to build up some credibility right?

Looks imminent to surpass the major milestone of £2/share

Itaconix - A business with a gradually falling SP, for what appears to be the last ~0-2.5yrs or so.

For a security to be considered for fast entry to the FTSE 250, its full market capitalisation (i.e. before the application of any investability weighting) must be equal to or greater than GBP 1.14bn and its investable market capitalisation must be GBP 1bn or above.

MarcusExile - It'll take LSE all of 5 seconds to establish the IP addresses for Aim and I are completely different, as we are entirely different ppl. But if you wish to waste your time then so be it!

Fair point AdamWoodman - Well BoE minutes tomorrow I expect will reveal plenty of weakness in consumer sentiment but not only that, delaying of investment too and possibly narrative on large cash outflows (due to chancellor having scared many into making rash decisions). So I reckon although a 0.25% cut is just about a sure certainty as can be, it'll be the minutes which may cause some market selling activity, combined with profit taking by some ahead of festive period and for paying January HMRC bills... I reckon CPI will fall to 350-360p by COP tomorrow.

DYOR - IMO

AimMaster2018 - Cheers! Currently contemplating making a small trim on SSPG but still undecided. Mulling over it as an available possible option, and why not?!

JackieDab is appears content to live in an echo chamber filled only with views aligned to the ramping of EZJ.

Consumers cutting back - ticket price was on the cards. I reckon JP Morgan have called this correctly tbh, as BoE is unlikely to cut rates rapidly enough to fully counter for the fast dis-inflation landing.

IMO - DYOR

Https://www.foodtravelexperts.com/media/q11pqu5h/ssp-group-plc_annual-report-and-accounts_2025.pdf

Wise move there Eightyeight88 IMO - Oil plunging, dis-inflation well underway, unemployment rising, GDP stagnant - possibly even falling already. Price war for airliners looks inevitable. £4 a share soon here for EZJ - DYOR, all my opinion.

Trisor, and tbf many others, often make foolish assumptions where it comes to the usage of the word 'they'.

Incorrectly assuming that I'm doing this to be in keeping with the modern usage of 'they' for those situations where gender is 'unknown'. It's an uneducated assumption of course and I'll explain why...

There are in fact many other uses (all grammatically correct), when it can be perfectly reasonable to utilise the word 'they':

Overview:

"they" can absolutely be used for one person, a practice known as the singular "they", which is grammatically correct, similar to how "you" can refer to one or many people.

Historical Usage: Singular "they" has been in English for centuries, used by Shakespeare and in older texts.

Convenience: It's more concise and natural than "he or she" or other constructions.

Reflexive forms include "themself" or the more common "themselves" (e.g., "They sorted it out by themself/themselves").

Presumably, you're a big fan of ol' Bill Shakespeare Trisor? After all... they don't get much more English than Shakespeare themself! (see what what I did there with my usage of 'they' again!?)

Trisor - Let me break it down for you here:

'Bubbles59 -' -This is the username to whom I was referring.

'aptly demonstrating there how exactly they' - They refers to the user called Bubbles59

'keep law & order in their household, through teaching their family members a 'Very Valuable Lesson'.' - here I am directly quoting the phrase 'Very Valuable Lesson' words which the user called Bubbles59 said.

At no point was I ever referring to you Trisor, or to TerryM1 or Trenners either.

Does that explanation help you?

And my reply was directed* towards Bubbles59.

Thank you for proving my point

And my reply was directer towards Bubbles59.

Thank you for proving my point

Trisor - Can you please share the bit where I've apparently suggested you're a volent thug? - BTW I have not done as you claim. Maybe you should check before shouting and reporting? Because I was in fact replying to Bubbles59 - as specified in my post Today at 13:53 on this thread. Notice the start of my post?

Trisor - Then why report any one of my posts? I have not said anything either profane towards you or anything else deserving of being reported.

US Fed Decision was last week - Next one late Jan 2026