Thanks DGR. That seems to make sense. I don’t know if you could answer this though. Can Pacific Trends ( or whatever they are called), raise capital if they wanted to, against those shares?
Dip, you are perfectly correct. I was trying to help out a poster from being ridiculed for his thoughts.
If I could ask you, “ what are the benefits to Pacific Trends in making this deal? Tied in for at least 12 months with conditions for selling in the second year.” Thanks in advance.
No they have done it with Ggp instead. ( 12 months lock in and a further 12 months were sales will be managed.
There was always an outside possibility that JOM could approach Pacific Trends. Shaun has had the foresight to. Cut that option off. He must have been aware of the potential harm to the share price, so good on him, looking after the shareholders. I love it when people come on here ****ging off people with the benefit of hindsight. Oh to have that knowledge and power.
Unfortunately he cannot give news during his presentation otherwise people sat there would be disadvantaged. It is probably just an update on where GGP is at this moment in time.
We all believe Shaun is coming over to talk about Havieron. Could he be coming for anything else? A sale of the Tasmanian assets? A buy out or j/v with another company? (Although a buy out would stretch our finances at the moment). A new j/v with Newcrest? Ernest Giles? A rights issue? ( only joking) New tenements applied for?
If I’ve not covered everything there, please feel free to add. ;0)