Member Info for S740

So?

It's about % rise, not numbers.

Corrective RNS just out, the option prices are in pounds not pence as originally stated that's a relief, not that I'm a fan of share options in any event. I firmly believe that directors should buy there own shares like the rest of us, and be paid bonuses in cash when objectives are reached, unfortunately the world thinks differently.

When I went to school 0.1p and 0.10p were the same thing, except that the second one would come back with a red line through the second 0 and "Not necessary" written in the margin.
Either the sums in the RNS are parts of a penny, or the company in which we are invested doesn't know the difference between pennys and pounds, clarification is necessary, urgently.

Current Ghana policy is a total ban on entry for all foreign nationals other than those with a residency permit or diplomatic status who must quarantine for 14 days on arrival. So being Irish makes no difference. An update on this policy is to be announced on Sunday, so maybe CLON have been given a heads up in advance on this, we'll see.

To correct the misinformation you are spreading cloggy, the visibly unwell minister you asert as having COVID has actually tested negative.

Don't worry about it Daniel you're almost a winner, I only need 579.5% rise from here to breakeven and I'm sure that there are some worse than that, still you can't win them all just as long as there are some winners to balance it out.

I am becoming concerned that as yet we have heard nothing from AVAP regarding the remaining 3 ATRs' which flybe had leased from us, one of which which they had out on a wet lease to SAS. I think we are due some comment on this.

Speak for yourself Godders we are not all here sat on losses, I and I'm sure others have been on a free carry here for almost two years, true that I'm still here just to see what happens though and I should have sold out completely when I de-risked.

There are some very substantial statements there Tobin which I think need some support, particularly since the statistics at this admittedly early stage suggest that you are entirely wrong. If you can't support your assettations then I suggest you keep you scaremongering drivel to yourself.

I may be out of date here, but I do have the owner driver contract in my possession but a few years old and the payment terms are 30 days and anything sourced via ESL, vehicle lease, insurance, parking and fuel attract the same terms, so as long as the owner driver only draws fuel from an ESL site he has no outlay for diesel. What you describe are the terms for general subcontract which is different and much less attractive in this respect although much better in terms of paddling his own canoe.

Quorum European Partners could be what your thinking of but that's not recent.

Thanks to Gonzalez for sharing his interesting and useful piece of research. Very interesting, unfortunately it seems we may be waiting until mid May for the EA. Also thanks to royoboy for his Friday evening game of rearrange these words into a grammatical sentence.

I've been trying Santa for years irishmouse very mixed results.

Rodger, Tiburn's advice is of course spot on, but your brokers cannot take your management fees, hold your stocks and then not make proxy votes for you. I would call their customer service number, it's on their website, at 7:30 tomorrow morning and tell them what you want to do, I think they will take your instructions over the phone and place your proxy vote with the registrar immediately. If they won't then follow Tiburn's instructions tomorrow am.

Just as a reminder to shareholders whose holding is held by a nominee broker, you will not be able to vote via the usual CREST online system. Instead you must call your broker and after security checks they will take your vote over the phone, the call being recorded, they will lodge your vote directly with the registrar.
You must take action to vote, if you just wait for a voting form to appear on your broker page you will miss the opportunity to vote, whichever way you lean.

MadChatter, you say that from the Align proposal letter you believe that they "intend to take the board over the coals". The first sentence of the second paragraph says "I am not interested in recriminations from past events and have no agenda in that regard." I understand that to indicate entirely the opposite. I have to say that I would be very much in favour of an investigation and subsequent action against certain miscreants, but all in due course the first imperative is to stabilise AAOG if possible.

I don't know why I made two posts of these points, but anyway.

I'm surprised nobody has commented on, or even read the 16:30 RNS of yesterday. Seems like DBAY or bust to me.
I know which one I'd go for but then I'm a haulier not a holder.

The Stobart name has no value whatsoever to ESL, since all rights rest with Stobart plc.

I have just been talking to an old friend who whilst not inside ESL he does have a foot through the door. His opinion is that a year from now it will be private with three shareholders, DBAY, William Stobart and Andrew Tinkler. Just one mans opinion, but it's as good a guess as any I've heard.

Oh yes, doubt he ever went away in reality, today's Daily Telegraph suggests he is about to offer £75m for all ESL stock.

It's funny peculiar really and a lesson for me too, when I invest in holes in the ground as i do those within the industry must look on thinking "why are they investing in that?" Whilst I and others from within the transport industry look on here thinking "they're all mad", of course we and you are not, just lacking in inside knowledge. Unfortunately if we stuck to investing in what we know nobody would ever invest in anything.