Member Info for S740

Couldn't do that again, the Anatanov 225 was the largest cargo plane in the world and was Ukrainian not Russian. The Russians blew it up in its hangar in the first few days of the war.

DB has over the last 4 years said several times, admittedly only in presentations and Q & A sessions not RNS, that whilst he is always open to new or further opportunities UK onshore which may come up from time to time and pass Dr Bulls sliderule, he has no interest at all in offshore. I will take him at his word until he does otherwise.

You won't have long to wait Cloudsurfer, drilling multiple holes as we speak, there will be first news this year. Of course what the news is,,,,,that's another question, but the intentions are there and the geology is good. Oh yes, and the salaries are very modest from what I hear.

I think/hope time will prove you wrong, from what I can make out from the memorandum 70% at least are in very sticky fingers, and from what brokers are saying most of the rest are with HNW long-term investors. I'm guessing less than 10% in free float.

Back in April on a thread deleted due to nonsense surprise, surprise, I said I thought Brent would see $80, by the year end; I stand by that, in fact I might revise that to November. There's a slowdown at best, quite possibly a recession coming fast, demand is going to drop and governments are going to intervene to keep a hold on inflation.

It's illegal under ADR (dangerous goods) rules for a tanker to operate at less than 80% full, so approximately 170 barrels is the least they will move. Economically however when you have sufficient on site storage, as we do, to cope with the ebbs and flows of production, why would you let a tanker go less than full, if wouldn't make sense.

Of that choice, Gove by a country mile. Saw Hunt and Johnson both present at the hustings in Manchester last time. Hunt was totally uninspiring, I went with an open mind not being enthusitic for either but afterwards I would, and did, vote for the alternative however unsuitable and would again.

Well we have a couple of apparent CFOs who like EBITDA, then you have https://youtu.be/l82kIjqBtqw

Make your own mind up, personally I don't take much notice of it, my problem is that it doesn't take account of depreciation. I go with net before tax, and free cashflow myself.

Oh dear Nightingale, that bet didn't come off.

I will definitely be coming nack into AVAP in the near future after having bailed some while ago having been in originally since 2019. Unlike triumph I look forwards to seeing the debt pile increasing since a leasing company without debt is a leasing company not doing any business.
It's a well run business with senior management who have slways had my confidence which has only increased in their handling of the pandemic. Hopefully senior lenders share my view and we can grow the fleet upto the 100 level over the next 2 to 3 years by which time Mr Chatfields phone will be ringing with buyout offers. All good in my view.

These people really are a worry, there was never even a suggestion that the dividend was going to be payable in cash. Where do these people get their information from?

Restrictions ended a month ago Grove, it's just broker incompetence now.
One thing which has become very clear from this is who the brokers are with shareholder (ie their customers) interests at heart and those who view PIs as a nuisance. I have been critical in the past of ii but I have to say they've come out of this smelling of roses. Whilst I have sympathy with those suffering with less active brokers rather than complaining on a forum I think I'd be moving my account elsewhere by now.

Sorry Pboo, but at 08:50 GMT Saturday it isn't yet Sunday anywhere.

As I said earlier moniman your this is a Croft issue, not ORPH or POLB

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.openorphan.com/sites/openorphan-v2/files/2021-10/Croft_Nominees_Trust_Undertaking_Redacted.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8-o7cmOL3AhWJa8AKHRXUC6M4ChAWegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw33bAUuE_LJ4gzYXeh5Ytuu

The above link (I hope it works, if not Google is your friend) is the agreement between ORPH, POLB and Croft Nominees setting up the trust. If you look at page 2 para 5 it quite clearly states that it's Crofts responsibility to forward the shares in line with the register after not more than 5 days from the end of the lockin period. Your question should be directed to them, although I haven't yet discovered either a phone number or email just a snail mail address, bit I'll keep digging.

It's Croft causing the delay, I'm sure they won't see it as such just going through the process type of thing. POLB lost control of the shares when they were locked into the nominee trust account.
My main criticism of CF, and it was he rather than JS, is that he went into this arrangement admittedly on "expert" advice without fully understanding the process himself; I bet he won't do it like this again.

Whey-hey, another 434.8% and I'll be in profit! And it might well happen.

Because Poolbeg have a different NOMAD, finncap rather than Arden. Arden are a joint broker to POLB, but that's not affected by the takeover in the same way.

Yes, got a corporate action notice from Interactive Investor last week. If you wish to take advantage of the offer I suggest a call to HL pronto, I certainly have not taken up the offer.

Far be it from me to stand up for Heid, but Elephant Oil Ltd., is a UK company, privately held. It is however expected to IPO on NASDAQ in Q3/22 as Elephant Oil Corp.

Most of this letter is personal opinion and therefore worthless in getting a Secretary of Stste to call in the application. The remainder has, in my view, been dealt with during the application and hearing process. Whilst I cannot see, but I'm not a lawyer, any sound legal objection to the councils actions in passing WN, I am prepared to admit that this may result in a delay whilst this nonsense is put to bed, hopefully not too long; the great advantage for UJO is that if there is a delay the value of WN will keep rising whilst we wait.