Member Info for S740

Dave T, I'm sorry but the truth has always been that this garden was never rosy, Wincanton were never going to be given a fair crack and that ultimately Tinkler would be back involved, as for caring about shareholders, get real. The Cumbria Mafia stirkes again, suck it up.

I attended the Share Society event in Manchester yesterday evening and I can say that Bruce Dingwall was firm in reiterating that they are looking at starting dividend payments at an unnamed but not too distant time, but that buybacks will not be happening.

Breaking my rule of not commenting on companies I don't hold now for the second time, but worth saying.
This seems even cheaper from DBAY's point of view if the industry rumour, and I stress rumour that the original directors of TPN which ESL bought a couple of years ago have made an offer to buy it back or £60m. So there you have the required £55m plus a tidy day 1 profit. Again if true.

This placing talk is quite useful. Anybody I read mentioning a fundraise is put into the mental box marked "moron", and are forever ignored. So reducing the number of posts I have to read.

Sorry Heid but all the excitement must have gone to your head if you think that BXP will win so much as one seat, much though the theory might appeal to me the practice is that a vote for BXP is a vote for Corbyn. If 10% of the electorate vote for them it will cost the Tories upwards of 50 seats in my view, whilst I agree with Farage in almost everything he is the most dangerous person in British politics right now, and consequently to my UJO profits, future wealth and retirement plans.

It's interesting how different brokers operate. My OO shares are showing as a separate holding called BPC (non tradeable), for the full number of shares but showing as zero value, but my cash balance has not been touched as yet.

I don't usually post on shares I don't hold, and as somebody who is 4th generation in this industry I wouldn't hold ESL if they are giving them away, the sooner the Cumbria Mafia are consigned to history the better in my view.
I will however pass on a little logistics joke doing the rounds a few years ago, about the TV series (don't get me started) time. "What's the difference between Stobart and DHL? DHL is a transport, storage and logistics company; Stobart is a PR exercise which sometimes move a bit of stuff."

I would say that it's too soon to say. The airline has apparently always run profitably, so if the administrator can get a prompt sale for it then any loss should be minimal. If not, then we have three newish A321s to move, so there will be a short term hit, however due to the 737 MAX fiasco the world is short of medium range narrow body jets so medium term we may even be receiving a higher lease payment or a sale at over book value. So whilst I see it as an immediate concern, I'm not too worried into the future. Just my initial take.

Very interesting and concerning happysparrow. I've just flipped the links over to my MP for his response, what are the odds on my getting one? We'll see.

It's a gas tank 100% definite certain, probably robably Nitrogen. High pressure barrel, no loading lids on the top and if you look half way down the tank you can see a small steam cloud that is a small amount of super cooled nitrogen liquid escaping into the atmosphere either due to the barrel warming up in the sun causing some expansion or during the discharge process. This sort of emission is perfectly normal from an inert gas tanker since it presents no hazard. Nitrogen is only classed as hazardous because it's an asphixiant in an enclosed space. Yes too much information I'll be quiet now.

The first tanker isn't really a tanker, it's a mobile storage tank for onsite storage. The second tanker appears to be a gas tanker, unfortunately we can't see any labels or the back, you can tell a lot from the connections. If it's a gas tank and i believe it is, a good guess would be Nitrogen. If anybody did see the labels nitrogen is 1977.

There is no mention of vehicle movements in the RNS royoboy, they are in the Traffic Movement Agreement of January 2013. The fact that the RNS is so definite about 24/7 working backs my reading of the TMA, but others take a different view. We will find out shortly which view the council take.

Sorry, RNS should read EWT

Oh yesthey are. 07:00 to 18:00 7 days during RNS as a minimum. My reading is 24/7 to allow continued working but that's open to interpretation. All as discussed yesterday.

The payments are agreed and have commenced, therefore I don't believe that an RNS is necessary for every month, we can assume that they are occurring. Now if one were missed, that I would consider to be for an RNS. Maybe it might be useful if the company let us know how they are playing this one.

Why? Do you not think that road transport or refineries work 7 days a week? I can assure you that they do, including Christmas day if necessary.

Can you put a link to the tanker hullcity11, maybe I'm being numb but I can't locate it. If I see it, I'll tell you what it's for.

I'm sorry but a tonne is not an alternative spelling for anything. A ton is an imperial ton or 2240lbs, and a tonne is a metric tonne or 1000kg, they are different and distinct. As I set out previously.

What are you talking about 1nne55co, as follows.

1 ton = 2240lbs (imperial)
1 tonne = 2205lbs (metric)
1 short ton = 2000lbs (US)

This is 199 tonnes
199 000kg (metric)
438 785lbs (US)
195 tons 17 hundred weight 3 quarters and 7 pounds. (Imperial)

Take your pick.

Just for the sake of pedantry and nothing else, a UK spec unrefined oil product road tanker has a max legal capacity of approx 29.5tonnes or 215/216 barrels, they vary slightly according to exact spec of both unit and trailer, so 1458 barrels of storage is 7 loads, with a bit to spare.