Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
If the 'interested party' was a fiction of the companies imagination, then that will be yet another nail to hammer into the boards coffin.
I have a contact who is a free lance journalism (did a full page article about myself in the Telegraph a few years ago, but that's another story).
They will be my first port of call, unless the suspension of share is lifted.
Very rarely post nowadays, due to the many idiots who obviously repetitively post negative posts, without expanding on their reasons.
I also have the same problem with repetitive positive post, lacking expansion. ( on another thread, 1 poster posts nothing but, boom, boom, boom).
This announcement obviously required a RNS, as apart from the extension of contract, includes added content from the original RNS dated 27th July 2015.
I suggest those who say, nothing new, look at the RNS from 2015 and compare it to today's RNS, that's if they can be bothered with facts.
Good news, the the following statement shows just how protracted this legal process is, 'The decision to lift the provisional stay of enforcement is unrelated to the merits of Italy's annulment request. A final hearing in relation to Italy's request to annul the Award is scheduled to take place in Q1 2024.'
So it looks like payment can be enforced, but any monies stay in the Escrow account until the final, final appeal is heard, so not ideal, but at least progress.
If bio fuels are so good, we have to ask, why is it that airlines that use even part bio fuels are needing to service/clean their aircraft engines more frequently.
It is obvious that bio fuels gunge engines up more than none bio.
Obviously the same is occurring in all engines that use such fuel.
The former Carillion Finance Chief Zarif Khan, gets 11 year director ban.
Zarif Khan, The former CFO stepped down as CFO of the construction service shortly after it collapsed.
The insolvency service said Mr Khan caused the company to rely on false and misleading financial information , was responsible for 'misleading market announcements'.
Last year the insolvency service applied for 8 directors linked to the business to be disqualified .
Litigation is continuing against other directors with a trial date being set.
The only additional comment I make, is the misleading statement rings a big bell with another company.
I will say no more.
Boffin,
I read it to mean that PHE now own everything on that site and are therefor fully in charge of any development.
It does say that Protos are still the landlords of said site, but I have no idea how long any agreement re tenancy is.
Perhaps if the RNS had stated that there would be a delay in the pump instillation the SP might have gone up.
We always knew that the markets could act weird at the best of times, but today SP re Cornish Metals is just bizarre to say the least.
Just when you think the smell can't get worse, the company release an RNS re they will not be in a position to publish its annual report and accounts for the year ended 31 December 2022 by 30 June 2023, being the deadline provided by Rule 19 of the AIM Rules for Companies.
I doubt anyone is supprised re this.
I have sent the following e-mail to Chris Farrington at Resolve.
Can you state the legal statute that applies to the following statement by yourself, when neither a none disclosure or/and any confidentiality clause has been signed between Resolve and myself.
Please note that this response is strictly private and confidential, and you are not authorised to share it with any other party other than as may be required through the insolvency Complaints Gateway if you choose to use it.
NOTE....... Civil law holds case law secondary and subordinate to statutory law.
Peterross,
I received the same from Chris Farrington.
My understanding is that unless there is a signed, confidentality agreement and also a none discolure agreement then the information can be released to everyone vand anyone.
As I did not agree or sign to such, I will have no hesitation if/when the time comes to use the info/details received in my corespondence with the FCA and also the media.
The warning from Resolve and Chris Farrington is just an attempt to avoid exposure into what I still belive is a case of possible biase, hence a not fully independed proceedure.
First time seen AFCtoiletbrush posts.
As they are full of informative information, I have added him/her to my ignor list of all those other posters who are of the lower inteligence order.
I have no problems with posts, posative or negative re AFC, but not posts of such childish drivel, they belong in pre school.
Elartu,
I saw a scan of a cancer on BBC news that stated this could be viewed by several specialist or/and doctors, therefor allowing the opinions of more than 1 specialist, without it being forwarded individualy.
No company was named, but I automaticaly thought of Feedback, be nice to be right.
Cashforquestions,
Out of the counrty for 2 weeks and do not follow social media when away.
Will catch up on return
Cashforquestions,
Details saved and will be added to any requset from the FCA for further info. That is, if the FCA ever even aknowledge my complaint, never mind investigate. They do not even send a ref number like they used to.
Boudicca,
If your broker is correct and they have been informed before a RNS release, then that would yet again be market abuse by NNN. If you have recived such info by e-mail, could you possibly, copy and post on here.
Redacting your personal info of course.