The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
Plus of course, more and more councils, and planning officers, will start to look at the pollution footprint before granting building permits, as well as new constructions to transport, IE roads rail ect ect.
There is only one direction for diesel, and one for cleaner low to no pollution energy production, diesel use with drop drastically, whilst newer cleaner energy increasing pro rata.
Parity with Diesel, can be already achieved with longer contracts for the supply of hydrogen, plus of course the move more into ammonia, which as we know is both more abundant and cheaper. Plus they are working on cheaper capital costs.
I also see a couple of mentions re companies, locations have have not seen before, as well as extensions to leasing and new leases.
As soon as I saw I read the RNS, my first thought was good, my second was, 'How long before the regulars pick fault'. Did not have to wait long.
The implementation of AFC Flue Cell in data centres, was mentioned about 10 years ago. I had started to think that the idea had been abandoned as it has been so long since it has hardly been mentioned since.
Nice to see that it still has strong potential.
Surely not long to wait for that first major contract RNS.
Agree, nice update. I am invested in several companies, where the main complaint is 'lack of updates', so its good to see investors being kept in the loop.
Plenty to look forward to in over the next 3 years.
Tonight's TV program should generate more interest.
Hi RivieraRick,
You don't have to see/read posts to know that the same drivel or blatant ramping is taking place.
Whenever I see that, 'This message has been filtered, please adjust your filters to view', you have a good idea that those you filtered are spouting the same stuff.
Not posted for a while, due to the constant drivel spouted by some posters, taking over thread.
I have far more from the AFC thread, than any other of my shares.
This improves the contents somewhat, now if only those who also comment about so many individuals ruining the thread, would also ignore them instead of feeding their agenda, the thread might just get back to being a worthwhile read.
As often said, I have no problem with opposite views/posts, as long as they are well argued, and don't repeat the same contents ad infinitum.
The power to improve the thread is in our hands.
Putting an obvious de-rampers (Pumpky and Floorman) on ignore.
I have no problem with any views held, as long as they are sensible and/or well argued, and whilst appreciating the RNS contained no orders, it must still be one of the most positive RNS's I have seen in my 30 plus years of investing.
With so many avenues mentioned, the company would not leave themselves so obviously open to complaints to market authorities if at least the vast majority of their claims do not come to fruition.
Anyone who looks at the RNS as a negative, makes it very obvious that they have a de-ramping agenda.
Trisor,
Such a placing can be offered to existing shareholders, but it is not necessary under the rules.
For this placing, the purchases of these share will already have been decided, so it will be cheaper for the company, plus those buying will be as every disadvantaging us small private investors.
I hope that this placing is to enable the company to move quickly into at least a couple of deals with all these major companies that are according to the RNS 'showing significant interest', otherwise I will be looking to hold NNN's feet to the FCA fire.
Many years ago, I took another company to the FCA that like NNN, several times over promised.
Taking a company to the FCA is not that difficult, but the system is not 'open' as there are rules of levels of breach, that can restrict the complainer being notified of the outcome.
I still have faith, but will not be riding on promises for much longer.
Nanoo,
Its not yet 1230 so a RNS can still happen, but I doubt it very much.
If Duffin had said that he anticipated one single RNS re commercial research, that would not be so much of a problem, but to say "I would anticipate we would sign a ......Good Handful..... of those commercial research
agreements by Christmas" would in my view be deceiving the market.
The next few hours will tell!
I think its the high p/e ratio that is keeping the price down
The p/e has to come quite a bit down to show true value.
Don't get me wrong, this is not an attempt to de-ramp as I am a strong believer in this companies future as with all areas improving in the last 12 months, I continue to view the company as a world beater.
The company is still under the radar of both investors and potential clients.
I have bought several tranches of shares over the almost 6 years since I first bought in at 38p, which strangely enough is the current mid price, all other buys have been at a higher price, so on the whole my holdings are down.