Member Info for Rooky

Not posted for a while, due to the constant drivel spouted by some posters, taking over thread.

I have far more from the AFC thread, than any other of my shares.

This improves the contents somewhat, now if only those who also comment about so many individuals ruining the thread, would also ignore them instead of feeding their agenda, the thread might just get back to being a worthwhile read.

As often said, I have no problem with opposite views/posts, as long as they are well argued, and don't repeat the same contents ad infinitum.

The power to improve the thread is in our hands.

Deserswolfch,

I know there is no need to apologise, but if ever I am proven wrong, I have no problem admitting so.

Still awaiting proof of your comments

Desertwolfch,

If you do find it, I will have no problem apologising.

Desertwolfch,

I have not considered your posts deserve you to be put on ignore before, but as others have said, show one analyst that says AFC have no plan/structure.
If you can, fine, if not on ignore you go.

Putting an obvious de-rampers (Pumpky and Floorman) on ignore.

I have no problem with any views held, as long as they are sensible and/or well argued, and whilst appreciating the RNS contained no orders, it must still be one of the most positive RNS's I have seen in my 30 plus years of investing.

With so many avenues mentioned, the company would not leave themselves so obviously open to complaints to market authorities if at least the vast majority of their claims do not come to fruition.

Anyone who looks at the RNS as a negative, makes it very obvious that they have a de-ramping agenda.

Trisor,

Such a placing can be offered to existing shareholders, but it is not necessary under the rules.
For this placing, the purchases of these share will already have been decided, so it will be cheaper for the company, plus those buying will be as every disadvantaging us small private investors.

I hope that this placing is to enable the company to move quickly into at least a couple of deals with all these major companies that are according to the RNS 'showing significant interest', otherwise I will be looking to hold NNN's feet to the FCA fire.

Many years ago, I took another company to the FCA that like NNN, several times over promised.

Taking a company to the FCA is not that difficult, but the system is not 'open' as there are rules of levels of breach, that can restrict the complainer being notified of the outcome.

I still have faith, but will not be riding on promises for much longer.

Nanoo,

Its not yet 1230 so a RNS can still happen, but I doubt it very much.

If Duffin had said that he anticipated one single RNS re commercial research, that would not be so much of a problem, but to say "I would anticipate we would sign a ......Good Handful..... of those commercial research
agreements by Christmas" would in my view be deceiving the market.

The next few hours will tell!

At least the correction is a positive, as purchased shares are usually better than subscribed shares.

No dilution and is also an indicator that the company were not pushing the bowl out for finance.

Fully agree oogleflugal,

Its as you say, re 'in line being like a profit warning' in the way markets are looking at results.

No logic.

I think its the high p/e ratio that is keeping the price down

The p/e has to come quite a bit down to show true value.

Don't get me wrong, this is not an attempt to de-ramp as I am a strong believer in this companies future as with all areas improving in the last 12 months, I continue to view the company as a world beater.

The company is still under the radar of both investors and potential clients.

I have bought several tranches of shares over the almost 6 years since I first bought in at 38p, which strangely enough is the current mid price, all other buys have been at a higher price, so on the whole my holdings are down.

Hemp....Replacing bottles, roofing plates, toys, packaging, building materials, textiles, electrical components, vehicle interiors, the list is endless.

In fact if more use could be made with old, un-recyclable plastics, I could actually see its use increasing, not decreasing.

Plastic is actually one of the more useful and cheapest material on the planet.
Its not the production/use of plastics that is the problem, its the disposal of said plastics.
Get the re-cycling and disposal right and a big slice of the plastic problem goes away.

I have almost 100% faith in the technology, but almost nil% in Peel as a partner.

The worse move PHE ever made was getting into bed with Peel.

Zodiac, Its the mention of financing that attracted most investors attention, so I am surprised the sp is up at all.

I am invested in a mining company, also on AIM, which gives regular updates on its exploration, construction, processing as well as assay results.

If a couple a couple of months goes by, without any big news, they always keep their investors informed, even if its progress proceeding as previously stated, or quicker/slower than expected.

If only PHE would keep their investors as informed, it would at least stop us often feeling that we are being kept in the dark.

The future for companies such as PHE looks good.

All the big Oil companies are looking at alternative, green technology and have large departments that are 100% concentrated in that area.

The reason I know this as fact, is because I personally know someone high up in the Oil business and that these companies are becoming increasingly involved in talks, as competition is becoming more intense.

Most oil producers are buying up green energy companies, for 2 main reasons,
1 it can reduce their carbon footprint, by percentage of total production.
2 if they don't take these companies over, the competition will.

What I do know, is that all bodes well for companies such as PHE, with the chance of cause (in my view slim) that something can always go wrong.

That is not to say PHE can not stay out of the clutches of the big oil companies, as they may well succeed via the none takeover route.

Blimey, talk about not holding back regarding his opinion of Peel.

Meant to add that of course the AIM is still a penny share market.

Hi Ian12,
The AIM was a penny share market share index which meant that many years ago all listed/traded companies in that index has a low market cap.
That has changed over the years with several companies still listed/traded on the AIM having market caps in the billions.

A few examples...................

Rank Company Market Cap (GBP)
1 ASOS PLC 4.869 billion
2 Boohoo Group PLC 4.035 billion
3 Abcam PLC 3.211 billion
4 Hutchmed (China) Ltd 3.060 billion

Almost wrong, dam it.

I doubt the sp will be down anywhere near 13% on close, now watch the market prove me wrong.