Member Info for Rooky

With this JV agreement, comes what looks like equal seats at the table, so it looks like a far better agreement than they have with Peal.

Just waiting for the usual posters to pick holes in this announcement, which will be no problem, if any holes that they find can be quantified.

I think it is a case from many of us, that we have more confidence in the sp over the next 3 years than the remuneration committee.

As I said previously, I have no prob re granting options, its just that I would have proffered a higher sp target to aim at.

I think it is a case from many of us, that we have more confidence in the sp over the next 3 years than the remuneration committee.

As I said previously, I have no prob re granting options, its just that I would have proffered a higher sp target to aim at.

Nothing against such grant options, but don't think much to the target levels set over the period stated.

This is more of a tortoise target, when we wanted a hare.

Hi Mucksy,

Proactive Investor has stated it is Euston Station, so probably correct.

It must be the fact that the RNS is only for another unit, not multiple units being contracted that is leaving the SP currently level to Fri close.

But as Beachandsurf states, this is another unit to one of the biggest names in construction out there.

Surely, this must be a positive endorsement to the AFC system.

I said a while ago that I was as invested in AFC as far as I judged was risk worthy, but due to reacent news, if I had a few quid spare, I would increase my holding, as the risk level to my investment has been greatly reduced since the start of the year.

In many countries, water for irrigation is vital, so any water produced via the AFC system could be of value in this direction of use.

Without news, a correction was bound to happen.

What surprised me was that it took 3 days on a rising SP to do so.

Never good to see a falling SP but I don't consider it anything to worry about, as I doubt it will drop anywhere near pre Mondays level.

Mucksy,

You are correct. The number on the Enowas container is the same as the container number shipped out by AFC from the 2021 extreme racing season.

If anyone doubts this, just search for a pic of the AFC logo container shipped out last year to Extreme and compare.

Why a RNs has not been put out re this, is very strange, unless they are waiting a few days to release a combined release including further details as per a contract.

I have said many times, that I have no problem with anyone who has alternative views to mine, as long as they are well argued. I think most of us are of a similar mind.

But if we want this thread to get back to anywhere near worth reading (I now very rarely look in), lets ignore all the obvious rampers/de-rampers by not just putting them on ignore, but also not replying to those that post what those we have on ignore are still saying, as otherwise we are reading their ramping/de-ramping by proxy

If we all pull together, we can return this thread, to what it once was, a thread of good content, discussion and knowledge. We have the power, so use it.

Cheers MajorOak.
Will carry on researching, thanks.

Meant to add, if anyone else can point me in the right direction. it would be appreciated.

Hi Troajan,

Only been invested in this company for 18 months, and still trying to get my head around mining drilling results.

I learned quite a bit about oilies and oil drilling results after several years invested in such companies, but really struggling with reading/understanding mining drilling results.

Not one to ask others to do my research, but can you recommend any web site that has good, easy to understand explanations of such results that can help, as most I have found are confusing to say the least.

Obviously can should read con.

Bondy,

I hope you continue to post and not join others that have left the AFC thread.

I don't always agree with you (who does 100% agree with anyone on these threads), but you always argue your points, for and against in a fairly straight manner.

I have said, before on here, that I would sooner a person post something I disagree with, than post rubbish or/and offensive posts that have a main opinion I agree with.

Most of us want the same thing, IE to make money. Problem is some want to make money by attempting to can others.

I can't see the point of leaving a forum due to the idiocy of certain posters, just filter them.

If you leave, all that does is put more sensible, grown up posters in an even smaller minority.

We need points of view from both sides, as long as their views are sensibly stated, and not just ramp/de-ramping.

I am putting DW on ignore, as although he has in the past posted what I view as legitimate posts, his increasing moan, moan, moan, without actually saying anything different, has finally resulted in him joining my long list of 'none contributors'.

Surely we buy AIM companies on the main as a future prospect of making it to the big boy club, so even if it has taken many years to get to the present stage, the increase over the last year, in turnover and revenue, bodes very well for the next 12 months and beyond.

They have a decent amount of money in the bank, with what is now looking to be a great increase in prospects.

I feel that this time next year, we will be reading a trading update or/and results that will knock this years figures out of the park.

That is why I feel that the sp finish last at yesterdays close, even allowing for the massive general world market drop gives no relation to what the company is worth.

A great trading update, yet the sp down.

Just shows how topsy/turvy the market is at present.

Todays trading update, giving some excellent figures, is one of the best trading updates I have ever read during my 20 plus years of share investing.

The only negative for me, is that I only have a small % of my money invested in Feedback and at present do not have any spare money to invest.

Hi Domino1,

Any price ask or bid, is not relevant until all the MM's open their books.