Adrian Hargrave, CEO of SEEEN, explains how the new funds will accelerate customer growth Watch the video here.
Strange how as soon as any RNS is released, those who are regular criticisers must also be the fastest readers, whereas others take their time to read what the RNS actually contains.
Many points clarified and a few expansions on the tech plus how the 3 types of fuels can be used, Hydrogen, Ammonia and Methanol.
Hi Bootsox,
Sort of agree. The main reason I look at it as a dilution, is the purchase of Syntec is not yet proven, although I don't think it will be long before it is proven to be a good move on Eckoh's part, that is why I topped up.
My buy showed as a sell and yet the price was slightly lower than the 4 that showed as Unknown, when the Bid/Ask prices quoted were the same as when my buy was made, making it more likely that they were buys.
16:14:49 54.50 1,265,000 Unknown* 54.00 55.00 689.43k
16:14:39 54.50 965,678 Unknown* 54.00 55.00 526.29k
16:14:27 54.50 253,243 Unknown* 54.00 55.00 138.02k
16:14:21 54.50 47,058 Unknown* 54.00 55.00 25.65k
This is one of the few shares that I hold that has always stayed above my buy price (first bought 2017), so with 11% down today and considering the purchase of Syntec Holdings at a placing price of 54p, I have bought a few more at 54.3p.
Shame that PI's won't get a look in, so some dilution here that effects current holders, but looking at the timetable it will be all settled before Xmas, quick moving indeed.
Once this year ends, the acquisition which looks on first examination, a very good fit for Eckoh, the sp should quickly rise to cover the loss from dilution.
Would still liked a chance to have been included.
Oldfinger,
The closing price (officially) is the UT at 1635 at 1.05, but the bid price at the last pre close trade was 1.15, which I often take as this would probably be the lowest price you would get to sell.
Been invested in PHE for many years, and for the last few years its been my biggest holding.
My average buy price is .50p, so well happy.
That is not to say that with any significant drop, I am not a bit disheartened, as I like many am quite a bit down from the sp highs.
Hi Jackunion,
Although some is dumped at sea, the pics this morning showed mass piles of waste at private landfill sites.
As you rightly say , we do pay for these countries to take our rubbish, who rulers probably take a slice from these private landfill owners, but it is on the populations of these countries that the burden is put, who have no say in where their countries put this rubbish, which is often next to communities.
Just watched a report on BBC news, regarding the continuation of waste being shipped abroad from the UK to Rumania.
The report shows that despite the UK government promises several months ago, the UK waste problem is still being passed on to other countries. Obviously apart from the shipping costs, monies are still being paid to poor countries to take our waste.
Although the waste is general waste, it also includes large amounts of plastic, as shown as a black power after the many dumps that are set on fire at regular intervals.
Instead of paying out this cash to ship the problem to other countries, as we all know who are invested in PHE, there is a far better method of plastic disposal which is cheaper, better for the environment and morally justified.
Anyone else have a sudden blip on their CUSN holding.
Within 5 mins my holding in CUSN increased in value by £185,048.80p ( part copy paste from portfolio on LSE showing increase percent 25,140.38% amount £185,048.80.
I though for an instant that Xmas had come early. If Only.
Once invested, it is not always easy to unbiasedly look at a company, regarding buy, hold or sell.
Best advice is to look at any company you are invested in asking one question, 'If you were not already invested, would you invest looking at all the parameters, from company board, company area of technology, its stage in the development of that technology/product, that need of that technologies/product, company debt/cash situation and prospects, near, mid or long, depending on your investment aims.
Having been invested since AFC floated, my strategy was long term, although that term has been stretched by several years over my target point, a moan I still feel justified to make. Still that I hope (my moan) will soon be proved irrelevant.
Although not considering selling, I have just looked at AFC as a new potential investor, with a near to mid range investment period of 1 to 5 years, and looking at all the parameters, would consider AFC to be nearer to success than they have ever been.
Still as always a doubt that something could still come along to smash through my beliefs, but that doubt is very small, and is growing smaller still as 2022 approaches, regarding the next 12 to 18 months being a catalyst in the story of AFC.
As said previously, I was into Oilies for many years, learning quite a bit about the oil industry along the way.
Still trying to get my head around what all these drilling results mean and finding it very difficult, as it appears there are far more variables in the mining industry than the oil industry.
So I have nothing to add, apart from the results to a very untrained eye look very good, but will eagerly await the views of those more knowledgeable .
Forgive the sort of off subject post, but just to lighten the mood, not that holders of this share need a mood lightener.
I bought these shares at 10.4p in Feb of this year with compensation money received after a telecom inspection cover collapsed as I walked over it.
With no lasting injuries, that fall turned out not so bad after all.
Hi Jimmyman.
I am not suggesting that posters should not be called out, I have often done so myself, it's the constant repeating of that, especially name calling that I was posting about.
Like many, I accept and encourage all views, especially those that disagree with my views, as that's how we all learn, as long as those views are well argued.
In fact sometimes opposite views to mine, have made me look deeper into facts, figures and as a result I have come round to those opposing views.
To save clogging the thread with this, I won't continue along this theme.
For goodness sake, give all this name calling a rest.
This thread is fast joining other threads that have been taken over by name calling.
Either filter, or shut up, otherwise if you continue to be repetitive in your relies, you become equally annoying as those you moan about, in fact because it is often easier to put those who initiate posts, on ignore, it is more difficult to put others on ignore who do often contribute sensible and valuable posts to this site discussions.
I know the above will annoy many, but my sole purpose for posting, is another, probably unsuccessful attempt at trying to return this thread to what it once was, a thread where we could all learn by exchanging views, opinions and knowledge.
I fully accept that Cornish Metals knows of no official reason they can give/state for yesterdays price movement, but I think we all accept that leaks are often difficult to prevent when it comes to unofficial or/and suspected info, seeping out, even un intentionally.
Such leaks are often related to 'how many people in the know'.
I would think that in the field of mining, there are quite a few people involved in the drilling and testing of the core samples, so the possibility of such a leak is obviously there.
For those who have been investing for several years, no doubt they have experiences of sp's shooting up one day, followed by the required announcement of the company involved knowing of no reason, then followed a short time later by the official announcement of the leaked info.
Not saying the above is the case for Cornish Metals, but it does warrant consideration.
This is not an attempt to ramp (my record of posts clearly show I am not into ramping) and I admit to having no inside knowledge.