RE: Mms3 Apr 2020 14:48
A bit of Friday thought sharing....
I think about how PET were portrayed as quite literally ' no hope ' with no progression, no talks and no partners last year... its been a hell of ride for them though!!
If you were a shareholder at circa 1p you'd still be way, way up.
Go back to the PET RNS last year and look at how non descript' the company was portrayed - seen in the financial report - and when SP was circa 1p - then from no where came news of a partnership with a new concert party and whoosh the PET SP went to circa 25p.
This 'partnership' must have been brewing for months... but there was zero public news flow.... now here we have similar, that on the cusp of news being days or weeks away for CLON that we see a speeding ticket RNS being issued. Same BoD, same approach.
I would not be surprised that PET is taken over by CLON. A single co being formed. If it did happen...
The shares in contention between chase / PET / Tamraz concert are nulled and values appropriated into a new Co. This resolves the 'share issue' at hand, the new partner Tamraz and existing holders form new co that is PET+CLON, brings with it Tamraz and funding for Ghana. The BoD Clon options survive.
This would explain that Tano 2a is the asset that was prior talked by concert party but not disclosed (as it does not yet exist fully) and this being a co-operative deal brokered by Pan Andean and Tamraz.
I'm sure you get the jist. It's a play on words that may have been issued to shareholders and why loose dates were only offered as it was reliant on decisions. These decisions were / have been delayed due to circumstance e.g. insolvency bill being delayed (was meant to be 2019) and more recently COVID.
This is why this RNS today talks about how Tamraz has 'helped' in recent discussions surrounding funding for the Pan Andean licence. He wont be doing it for free, it'll be to become part of this concert party and to assist in realising the 'asset'.
- Surely it does not take this long to deal with un authorised PET shares.
- CLON Tano is subject to funding...(they have funding it's Tamraz concert party) as per RNS
- They cannot announce anything at this time as the passed bill is not an act yet (anytime now)
- They need GNPC to advise parliament to proceed or a different action for the ratification to happen (soon)
- This is why BoD have options with CLON and not in PET
- This is why Tamraz still is endorsing PET on Netoil website as there is a bigger picture behind the scenes
- BoD do deals. It's what they do. They own Botswana Diamonds and partnerships is what they are good at doing.
- Also interesting to see that the Lithium Bolivia deal is still progressing but with interim gov now. This being the first update to that since Bolivia crisis / Government change.
Much of this is a 2+2 calculation of course, like to see what you will think as to what will happen between CLON, PET and Tamraz.
GLA - all conjecture and rambling
D