Member Info for RichTheNewbie

Very odd that someone's been able to buy a larger amount at 7.1p
IG have been very reliable in terms of getting the best buy quote for me (and regularly when others can't buy - IG will always give me a decent quote).
I've even had situations recently where a dummy sell wouldn't give me a quote for a small amount but would for a larger amount (and I think even a better price for a larger amount crazily).
Almost seems like, at the moment, the the brokers are helping to feed a larger buyer, and not letting us retail mugs get the best price.
Not seen this before on any other share.

Much the same now. There's a whole £79 worth available at 7.1p before it jumps to 7.67p to buy any vaguely sensible amount.

Finished on the highs and with block purchases starting to come in.
A good day.
Hopefully breeze past 7p pyschological barrier, but I'm more interested in when it cracks 8p, if we hold through that, then we could start seeing proper gains, as being under 10p is just silly anyway.

Another couple of buys immediately moving the bid up.
If we get a little bit of momentum it'll be interesting to see if we've still got some overhang to be shifted or not.

I didn't answer the first part of the question as it's a given they're trying to sell the stock - and the deadlines don't change that - question is almost certainly purely what they're prepared to accept for it. As I say, for all we know they've sold 99% of it now, or conversely, they might retain 100% of it and feel they're best off taking the chance of waiting for LOXL2 and SNG001 news to maximise their return.
My personal guess is they've been selling some of it off-book (or binding agreements to buy it at a certain price) based on the rather odd trading of late. That's just a guess though, and as I say, I suspect the only way we're going to know they're done is if the price starts rocketing without warning. Or a TR-1 form comes. Or both.

Are we playing Jeopardy? Is the question "What is Google?"

I'm not sure but I don't believe it's been broken down.
Although you could pretty much work it out by finding an older list of all the Woodford stocks and sift it.
If it's on a stock exchange and has decent daily volume it's probably in A. If it's not it's in B.

Doesn't make any difference to this and the timelines only really affect the Woodford investors.
It's PJT selling the stock from Portfolio B that's the key and there's no visibility on their progress on that. For all we know they could have sold 99% of the Woodford SNG stock and be struggling on the unlisted ones.
I suspect the only way we're going to know they're done is if the price starts rocketing without warning. Or a TR-1 form comes. Or both.

Personally I’d prefer months.
The ideal scenario is Woodford gone. Then LOXL2 deal by PXS. Then SNG001 trial completes as a success. And if really greedy......an immediate deal that’s already been agreed for SNG001 contingent on success ;) (but that’s pushing it)

Seriously doubt it.
Just people trying to get the last knockings at bargain basement prices I expect.
Still a mysterious absence of TR-1's considering the recent trading....can't be long now until we see cover broken.

chilston - I'm fine just there's no need to overhype things and have people continually disappointed when it doesn't happen.
If there's an RNS with fantastic news tomorrow then great and everyone will be happy. If not then it'll just be about the 1000th time someone's predicted that and not been true ;) I see no basis for saying there will be so I expect nothing.

There's a few trades around that price. Are the rest other investors?

Almost certainly no purely based on the average number of times that prediction has been right ;)

Weren't mine....but have just increased my position a bit.

I would like to think so too (and some noises in that direction have at least been made previously).
Although it goes without saying I disagree with the always tomorrow timescale (and your obsession with Thursday RNSs :p)!
Right, enough waffle, back to the grindstone for a bit.

Appreciated.
Turning the convo back to FFWD. In the same vein as this disposal, I think FFWD would do well to hive off its other more questionable investments, even into some kind of wholly owned legacy vehicle (that could just be briefly referred to as one entity in statements - rather than taking up space on the website or financial docs / presentations).
I think the portfolio would look more credible as a whole, and coherent, if they narrowed the pack to Factom, Leap, Juv, Emmac, and Portage.
Things like PulseFlow, Vemo, and Yooya don't really fit with the pack overall imo, or are miniscule stakes now, and/or have extremely poor public visibility (Yooya I'm skeptical on - if it's going great guns it's hard to find evidence of - even with good digging and accepting that'd be more difficult on a foreign private co).
I think they're more a distraction/negative, than a positive, to a newcomer looking at the portfolio personally.

Matador - Compliment (which I consider that) accepted. Perfectly fine to agree to disagree on the merit (although I'm not sure I'd entirely disagree on the merit in principle either - was more how the company seems/seemed to be operating/performing/reporting).

I was wondering who'd be the first to start with that Forthewin.
It's always the same on here.
If you don't say everything is brilliant and going to make the stock rocket you just garbage posts like yours in response.
Zzzz

I agree Quint it's relatively inconsequential in the grand scheme of things now and at least they've got some money back (just not going to congratulate them or claim it's great when it isn't :p).

If it had gone up 10 fold I would have congratulated them heartily.
But it didn't.
So I didn't.
That's how it should work (rather than congratulating them on a cr*p investment!).

Matador - It's hardly the "crypto winter's" fault either. Some miners have done OK despite this "winter". As for saying nobody could expect that...........anyone who's not insane would have been expecting that as a very real possibility or worse..............as it was always extremely likely that the crypto's wouldn't all keep rising forever. Whether through scandals, regulatory pressure, or simply the ponzi bubbles bursting. It's no surprise at all to many.