Member Info for Ricardo2019

No, I'm querying why they said they couldn't talk about it, then went onto talk about it.

And if I wasn't clear enough, it's the regulatory AIM rules mention that confused me, when they clearly then go on to talk about permits.

> "Regrettably, I cannot share any information on either subject at this time due to the regulatory AIM rules. We fully appreciate how frustrating it is, and Alba's directors are equally frustrated with the delays. I assure you the Alba team is doing all they can to move forward with both the dewatering and waste dump. Once Alba receives the required permits, things will be able to progress quickly from there."

I don't understand their reply. They can't share any information yet go onto tell us they don't have the permits yet. Erm... what other news would be shared next if not that?

Gotcha, thanks for replying.

I've lost track so I'm going to be lazy and ask you rather than read the RNS's, sorry. This work is for a pad for a gas separator, right? And they're moving it because the old location wasn't suitable?

We have less than half a billion shares in circulation. That's not a lot.

Share buybacks cost significant arrangement fees and I'd much prefer a dividend when the time is right.

> Havent seen anyone talk about this, but if prospective buyer is infact Chinese/Japense we could see a big drop in price or a further prolonged sales process with the current Taiwan situation.

No-one's talking about this because it's nonsense. There's no link between this posturing and our business. Come back to me for a different answer when there's a significant military conflict (I won't be holding my breath).

IANAL and I'd love to know what data protection laws would apply to an individual broadcasting a company AGM. I reckon none is the answer. There may be a civil case depending upon if any T&Cs were accepted and then broken, or if any other sort of NDA or contract was signed. But data protection? This I have to hear about.

The joke didn't go over their heads. They didn't actually read the joke in the first place!

> In a word, No. It's a condition of being a forum member that it is not published here YET. The people who took the time and effort to organise it will decide when it's published on here, at least that is my understanding

I appreciate that members will want to adher to the terms of their forum membership, and I also appreciate that those who did the hard work may want to retain control over their output (although I can't quite think what the benefit would be). However I hope those fellow shareholders believe in making information available to all shareholders as much as possible, rather than retaining some for the benefit of a specific small subset of people.

Can someone stick it on Google drive or pastebin please?

> We are not Amazon and never will be.
We don't need to be. My point isn't overly complex, but I shall reword it in case you aren't being purposely obtuse: Those who believed in the fundamentals and held through the early setbacks reaped massive rewards. If you believe in the fundamentals of ALGW then you should believe you will be handsomely rewarded eventually. Else why hold the shares?

> The share price has been at this level since the IPO which is over four years now, apart from a blip last year.
Yep, and you do realise that investments should be viewed with a minimum of a 5 year time horizon? That can't be news to you.

> Don`t go out in the warm weather over the weekend there`s a good chap.
No idea what you're going on about here.

Why is it that you don't come across as the person you purport to be in your posts? You've told us multiple times how great your life is, but the way you talk to people comes across very differently. I'm not convinced you are being honest with us on your interests here.

Daisy, did you know that in the early days AMZN lost over 90% of its value in the space of 2 years. Would you have sold then? Would you have been moaning constantly? Damn right you would. I'm sure you'd have been ready to teach Jeff about building a business. You wouldn't be whinging now though if you'd held, and the thing is, it's clear from your posts that you have very little of value to add here. If you don't see any upside then sell. Go and pick a stock where you see that upside. What's that Daisy, you don't know where they are?

So... where's the reply then? What did it say? Why was it so positive?

I don't visit too often as the trolling drives me nuts, so apologies if I missed important posts. What's going on with these emails?

So you don't trust the company. But you trust the company to get you a 100%+ SP improvement so you can get your money back. Which is it, and can I have some of whatever you're smoking?

Your logic may be absolutely illogical but the great news for you is that you are very likely to get your money back (albeit it might take a year or so IMHO).

Share22k, I will take your word for it. Happy for you to have an opinion - as I already said, it was the usage of identical phrasing that caught my eye.

As for your holding, you must know that one of the fundamental rules of investing is that if you don't trust the company then it is madness to hold their stock. You must realise that people will judge the credibility of your posts by that.

I do share your view that a lot of news is going to be needed to get the price to 8p. Unlike you, I believe it is very possible given the right conditions. Hence I hold my shares.

Did you post that with the wrong account, Share22k? You used similar phrasing to another poster on here which is suspicious. A 'one-post wonder' too.

ALGW posted this on LinkedIn as of one hour ago:

"We’re looking forward to updating our shareholders early next week – Please look out for a company announcement."

Nothing there about any interview.

Sure it is. Imagine when someone invents a encrypted peer to peer messaging app, they won't need to put special messages out in plain sight any more.