Member Info for RegulatorUK

The MMs are going to struggle to keep a lid on this...

“ Pumpky”

Ahhh - I was wondering which green binned troll had infested this board. I suppose more of them will crawl out of their holes as this begins to move...

"It’s not a deramp. I have no reason to as I’ve been invested since last March."

Sure you have... and I'm dating Naga Munchetty.

“ And we still have no confirmation with working with the government...‘

That’s simply not true. The U.K.-RTC has a current contract with the government. So we know that ODX and others are working with the government.

But you’re right that the £75 million contract is not news though - and neither is much of the rest of the Twitter trash that’s been posted up here this evening.

Please spare us the constant Twitter links. Most of what you’ve posted from Twitter isn’t new, is well known to LTHs and has been discussed here previously. The fact some plonker on Twitter has only just noticed it is exactly why Twitter is not a reliable source of investment information.

"Massive testing programme: https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2021/W03/743243889"

It's not a contract - it's a tender. It's also not a tender for the testing devices. Whilst it adds to the general background - which most LTHs will be aware of - it doesn't directly relate to ODX or the UK-RTC.

@Tricky - just one addition

8. Deeks, as one of the main critics of LFTs, has been handed his arse on a plate as senior academics and scientists point out the fundamental flaw in his analysis and he's been forced to eat his words.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-55704312

I wouldn't be surprised to see similar in other parts of the UK.

Deeks, quite rightly, is getting his arse handed to him on a plate...

"The negativity brigade can swivel."

I can't imagine who you might be referring to....

;-)

... I topped up just in time.

...I topped up just in time!

"Balls to the WHO"

It's not the WHO at fault here. It's Hately-Brewer misrepresenting what the WHO guidance says.

It's also somewhat irrelevant as the UK is already doing what the updated guidance advises...

Have a some of both (I have)! :thumbsup:

SourceBio is also worth a consideration IMO.

Have some of both (I have)!

SourceBio is also worth a look as well.

I'm in!

"Still hoping for that box Satallite. I will wave to you from the Gallowgate!"

I assume this is a reference to wendyball?

Some of my ill-gotten gains will be used for some new ultralightweight camping equipment. I'm planning on a Portuguese camino this year (if the borders are open) with minimal accommodation. If the borders are still closed I might try and squeeze in the Old Way instead...

Can we please not quote the loathesome Covidiot, Ms Hately-Brewer? As per normal, she is completely misrepresenting what the WHO notice is actually saying.

This is also nothing to do with testing asymptomatic people.

"With the emergence of multiple new strains they are obviosuly having to retest all the tests to make sure they pick up all the new strains."

That may be the case for antigen tests - but not necessarily for antibody tests. The AbC19 and Visitect/Mologic antibody tests are likely to unaffected.

“ Can I ask anyone who has an online presence of significance, to ask this question: what is the effect of the vaccine on patients that already have antibodies for Covid-19. We need to know and highlight this potential issue, before we create our own self inflicted disaster.”

The simple answer is none.