Member Info for RealityChap

I've never filtered anyone before Meggies but you have absolutely nothing to contribute so welcome to a very exclusive club

Idiot.

Your premise that anyone not saying anything that isn't 100% positive isn't a shareholder is patently absurd. The only thing more absurd is to have been 100% positive while the company has produced no commercial deals of note and the price has correspondingly collapsed. There are small signs that may have abated but hat's all they are so far as we have absolutely no concrete information that hints at short term commerciality, and that is what is needed.

Stands back and awaits abuse.

Hands up who has ever been to an exciting AGM?

JW said that cash burn had been reduced. People presumably.

It's not negative to want to discuss relevant issues. Being positive with no real solid foundation is what has got all us shareholders into the position we are where the vast majority are significantly under water.

Ignoring your bizarre and incorrect obsession I'd say that to be glass only half empty after the last few years of AFC represents a position of unbridle optimism

Problem being that we did find one - ABB - but here has ben no indication recently that there is any life left in that relationship.

I guess, Bondy, that the issue here is that we need a very large and credible partner. No government is going to commit to putting key elements of the country's industrial and energy supply future in the hands of a loss making AIM company capitalised at £55m.

What, ADE, has the price of electricity got to do with running blast furnaces on coking coal?

You are missing the point Froggy.

This isn't basic H&S training that's being talked about. It took months (9ish but that's only memory) to get the200kw unit CE certified and all that has led to is silence in respect of the partnership it was actually designed for (ABB) and a trial which owes a lot to a subsidy. Although it appears to work perfectly well there are no positive vibes that I've come across that suggest actual commercial orders will follow.

This company has facilitated more trial than Sisyphus faced and simply doesn't have the scope to indulge many more - we need orders/partnerships and we need them very soon.

They may come but there is considerable uncertainty over when the full 'Fuel As A Service' model will be available commercially. We hope, of course, that the advanced talks we were told of nearly a month ago have become more advanced in that time and will lead to genuine deals that produce revenue in the short, medium and long-term.

The hope at present is that the AGM will shed some light on progress but it would be a rare thing indeed for an AGM to produce earth shattering news; it just isn't what they are for.

All we know now is that the company appears (so we don't really know) ready to take orders for a highly complex product for delivery in something like a year's time, and bitter experience tells us that many things can go wrong in that sort of timescale.

I can't be the only person that wonders why it is available to order now but the RNS announcing its arrival said it wouldn't be available for deployment until 2026. If someone orders one this afternoon does it take a minimum of 8.5 months to manufacture? Does it need to get CE marked? What happens in that minimum 8.5 months?

Thank you, John Lennon

I speak French well enough to follow that, even though the presenter is doing a passable impression of an Irish racing commentator!

There's nothing in there that we haven't heard before but it is interesting that a media outlet outside the UK has gone to the trouble of producing the item. What the reach, target market and credibility of that media outlet is, I wouldn't have a clue.

Oddly, I can't see a search facility on their website: https://www.france24.com/en/ which seems rather unusual

I'm intrigued, Frogfish. How have you concluded that he financials look good? It takes some imagination!

And the bus manufacturer, owned by a JCB family member, Wrightbus, has big plans to produce more

That's selective quoting, Gitfinger. It missed out 'for the time being' - which is fundamental to the meaning

For the time being JW's main attribute, that we know about, is that he's not Bond! His job now is to consign the Bond years to history and deliver something/anything.

We simply have to get something meaningful over the line in the next few months at most. No more vague partnerships, no more tests, no more MOUs - something that delivers real commerciality or we'll be in a very difficult place.

I think we need a definition of 'advanced' Three an a half weeks now since we were told that and, yes, these things do take time - but coming on top of Mike Rendall's 'they're ready to go' message at the November IM presentation nobody could possibly be blamed for taking a believe it when I see it approach given the history.

I hope JW can deliver something that extricates us from the land of Bond's ludicrously over-optimistic approach sooner rather than later.

Why is there no laughing emoji on this site?

Utter stupidity. So many times on here it has been explained that the marking of trades as buys or sells is not accurate. Yet day after day the same suspects try to claim that the 'mis-labelling' is part of some great conspiracy. Of they are really convinced that things are as bent as they claim then why on earth are t hey involved at all? As usual, anything that doesn't fit a narrative must be some sort of fraud or have ulterior motives. Nonsense.