Member Info for RealityChap

That 's still sales! Of course we need them!!

Why the secrecy I wonder?

Not had chance to read it yet but, please please let this be our time

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/AFC/joint-development-agreement/17069661

That makes it a good trading share, Spacerat (if it wasn't for the wide spreads). It won't be anything more than that unless and until we get some evidence of genuine commercial traction. And that has been the case for a very log time -which is why we are where we are.

The disruptor here is the uberbull, Mr C News. Posts the same things over and over again, refuses to engage in any meaningful debate and immediately resorts to personal insults. And that behaviour is all the more bizarre when he has been demonstrably wrong re just about everything he's ever saidf and he has been exposed as a liar multiple times.

I don't believe for a second that there are shorters operating on here, not for one single second. What there is, is a lot of disgruntled long term shareholders who have been misled by the previous management.

Wil the new team come good? Maybe. Are there any grounds yet to be convinced that hey will do? No. That's reality

Totally and utterly beyond help. You raise points, they are answered. You mouth off. Genuinely weird behaviour

You really do enjoy behaving like an absolute prat. You're being told something that is factual and useful (that used to be a primary purpose of this board) yet still you go to personal insults. You are probably beyond help. How did you asking for me to be banned for lying - despite me demonstrably never having done any such thing go? Oh yes, I recall - when it was pointed out that you were completely wrong you went silent. As usual.

You've been told so many times , CN., why can't you grasp that these boards are not accurate?

At the time of that transaction the spread was 8.51-8.99. The mid price was therefore 8.75. Because the trade went through below the mid-price it is identified, automatically, as a sell. It isn't an official site, nobody is misreporting it -it is just a simple mathematical calculation that is often wrong. No conspiracy, just an unreliable data source.

I know you just like to stick your fingers in your ears and la-la-la loudly when people say things that you don't like but these are just simple, indisputable facts. Not negative, not positive, just facts.

And, of course, as you must know none of the firms you say are leasing are doing so on commercial terms.

Acciona - trial upon trial

Tamgo - a demo unit

Brett - subsidised

Speedy - frankly, anyone's guess

Surely, even you must realise that if the capital cost is massively uncompetitive then there's no way that they can be leased under a pricing structure that makes economic sense?

So yes, we are relying on getting the overall package up and running and we are well aware that we are some way of achieving that as of now. It is very simple now; we need one or more of the advanced talks that we were in to bear commercial fruit or we are knackered. Binary.

Largely gibberish, OU. A visit from the King led to what exactly? Our hopes are firmly pinned on what we were told some weeks ago now were advances talks with potential cracker partners coming to fruition - if they don't....this rocket isn't taking flight. Let's hope they do, they might.

Any answer on what 17/18/19 are in specific relation to AFC? And as for this:

Our collaboration with ABB has deepened, focusing on integrating fuel cells into data centers and eMobility solutions. This partnership underscores our commitment to sustainable energy solutions.

Has it???

I've pretty much given up on this board - it's pointless - but I'll keep an eye on things just in case someone posts something relevant rather than waffle and bluster. So, in that spirit, what are these three in this so-called top 20, in AFC relevant terms?

17. Industrial Chemicals Limited: Announced plans to install a large fuel cell facility in the UK.

18. Samyoung and Changsing Chemical: Collaborated on a 50MW fuel cell park project in South Korea.

19. Dubai Carbon: Signed a memorandum of understanding for a 300MW fuel cell park in Dubai.

Likewise.

We don't know, Ade. Just like we didn't know who was leapfrogging us in the fuel cell world until it was all done and dusted - and then it became apparent that we were trying to sell commodity products at luxury prices.

It's the wrong question Ade, as per. It's not who has one, it's who wants one. Loads of people, we hope. As yet we have nothing concrete to confirm commercial viability and until then...

Daz, I think it's too early to think of that conclusion. The director buys have to be a positive, particularly given that was something the previous management were conspicuously reluctant to do. As regards previous failures i think we did have world leading products - but unfortunately we had impossible pricing - that just has to be addressed overall or we are history. my feelings re Bond are that he got dazzled by the scientists and pretty much forgot about commerciality, which is one hell of an indictment for a CEO. He can't seriously have considered the prices we were offering kit at and thought it was a goer.

I don't think we even want customers at this stage do we? We want a partner who can help this scale, get the cost as a whole down and add some weight and credibility to our offering. We can't afford to be making and providing serious and expensive kit for yet more trials

Exactly CN. bla, bla, bla. I'm glad you might be finally cottoning on. Where is the actual business?!

Exactly, Son. If we are deep in discussions with potential partners (and time marches on) let's see energies focused on getting that over the line.

Interesting, Tennents. So who do you see as our competition and any idea how comparisons would look there?

I was clearly answering a question from Blueboy who was asking why he couldn't see one. Quite obviously he was asking under the mistaken impression that here was one today! For pity's sake man, grow up, stop being paranoid and have an actual conversation.

Just as pertinently why are you posting year old RNSs when , quite clearly, the world of AFC now is very different to what it was then, as is most people's understanding of it, just not yours!

We know now, we didn't know then , that our fuel cells were miles away from being competitively priced and it is very obviou that the scheduled delivery in early 2025 simply hasn't happened.

What are you going to claim next? That Southern Oil is still a runner? That Urban Airport launch is just around the corner? That the charger highlighted in the Dunsfold to Dundee dash will be up and running next week?

You are talking absolute nonsense.