Member Info for ratcliffewriter

I don't think many of us need an oscillating proboscis diddlyfurkle to see that this share is undervalued.

As long as Scancell's crescendo sounds better than Bjork's screechy warblings...

Any gems to report or has the fighting not stopped long enough for it to start?

That's just over 200 quid. Some investment that is....

Looking at it now I'm home, it isn't the Thirsty Waster's work, it's a feature by Nigel Somerville. I'm not daft enough to subscribe to the bilgetank of that site, but the summary you get for free just says 'AIM-listed immunotherapy cancer specialist Scancell (SCLP) announced last week that the FDA had posed a few questions regarding its application to run a Phase II combination trial for its SCIB-1 skin cancer compound alongside a checkpoint inhibitor. The market saw this as bad news, and marked the shares down heavily – but I’m not so sure it is all that serious.'
Maybe not actually Scancell that has the questions asked, could be Ichor or Keytruda for that matter, or a combination, but with luck more detail forthcoming tomorrow. 'Not all that serious'? Quite probably not imo.

That's actually rather funny. Aggie gets treated with the respect he deserves, and let me see.... straight to bargain booze, buys a bottle of Algerian scotch and sends it to his mate with a note saying 'I know you don't follow this one, but can you write up this summary I've written?' Same old same old. Sad boys both.

Onw only ever turned up to start an argument and when comprehensively shown as such always 'had to go' but presumably got some thrill out of just sowing discord for the sake of it. Many of the other 'absent ones' got banned for breaching posting rules, pure and simple.

Spare a sheckel for an old ex-leper... Biblical Moditope!

They have always mingled in the past. I can't see why they wouldn't this time.

I can't make it (again!) - but would be interested if someone could ask CH if the 'monetizing of assets' comment earlier this year was simply the placing or was it a different plan, and was the hint of activity from 'left field' something that still lurks, and is it any closer than it was at the time or has it faded?

Trouble is, aggie will insist anyvtrade is a sell whether it is or not. Bile and spite have clouded his judgement. But hey, that's nothing new.

I predict the value will be somewhere inbetween those two figures...

And do they really mean ' 200 staff in a wide range of disciples'? Truly Mystic if he has 200 disciples...

Well at least the canteen should be OK - Atique Choudhury the man behind the business specialises in hospitality and the restaurant trade. Across his businesses Atique employs over 200 staff in a wide range of disciples from restaurants and consultative services. In addition to his restaurant businesses he is very active in consulting services providing leadership and mentoring as a Director and Project Management with his team for clients seeking his many years of expertise in relationship to new business ventures and start ups.

Yum Yum founded 19 years ago by Atique was at the forefront in a concept to bring a high standard of authentic and quality Thai Cuisine to London. As a qualified chef Atique has created his own unique style of brand, which collectively serves over 2000 customers per week.

Hi Stach - to be honest you were in and out of this like the Hokey Cokey and I lost track of where you were up to. TBH thought you'd managed to escape further up the ski slope. Hope you haven't lost too much in your SIPP

Just looking at the older RNSs as you do (or some do anyway) and saw in May 2015 they consolidated from 3,772,151,750 into 30,177,214 shares (now grown to 531,630,000 shares) The consolidation RNS of 22nd April 2015 said “the Board believes this affects investor perception of the Company. The Directors believe that the Capital Reorganisation should improve the marketability of ordinary shares to a range of investors, including institutional investors.” Does this mean they are more likely to consolidate again sooner rather than later or was the board talking through tis hat about 'improving the marketability' by stuffing up the sp by consolidation? All ideas welcome...

I understand what you're trying to say, but look at it this way - if someone was selling snake oil would you recommend it blindly because it was in a pretty bottle with a nice label, or would you ask around to see if it actually contained anything useful inside the pretty bottle?

All I did was read the link you posted and point out the truth behind it. For the sake of your blood pressure I suggest you leave it there and maybe dedicate your time to some proper research into VAL rather than behaving as you are.

Ditto.

No need to be so abusive - just wondered why you post a link without checking it first?