Member Info for ratcliffewriter

Presume the Croydon bedsit is getting to aggie, although you'd have thought he'd be used to a solitary existence after all this time. Maybe he's back as the doctor advised him to rest his right wrist for a little while.

That's the most amusing aggie post for a while. Not that he's missed when absent.

So bb you reckon it's 95 percent likely VAL will go to the wall?

Certainly seems odd to claim to have great news and solid facts but keep them hidden in a closed Twitter group, or even in as-yet unreleased RNSs. Still, just hope George has a nice stylish shell suit to wear to impress his audience next week.

Nomlungu - that link shows they have taken 4 years (with 8 months still to go) just to run 'A Phase I/II, Dose Escalation Study To Assess The Safety and Tolerability of VAL201'.
So no efficacy study, just dose escalation for safety and tolerability. Slow or what?

There's a danger of assembling 5 percent of shareholders and then they'd do another dilution and you'd find you only had 3 percent just as you were about to vote. Mind you it's one way of encouraging you to buy shares I suppose....

TF - Wildforce, Tuesday 16.48hs plus a couple of comments following.

Interesting to see response rate percentages much lower than SCIB1 and patient numbers of similar or smaller size. Scancell's results remain way beyond the usual norms.

A closed group of a select few with so much good news that they want everyone else to labour under the genuine belief this share is a dog. Or will they spill the beans? I bet not... what say you chelsea6. Or 5....

Indeed, with a decent update it would maybe tempt some to buy. If there's any actual progress, why is it a secret?

Strong buy is a default mis post. Should leave it as No Opinion here in the interests of fairness.

If? It will...

It certainly bodes well to be in a combo trial with a market leader, and as said yesterday it is significant that Keith Flaherty is as enthusiastic as ever to get on with it after 3 years of progress for competitors to catch up........or not. Apparently not!

TF you don't half wriggle and squirm at times. In what way is 'I'll eat my hat if we see much come out of either meet' significantly different to dismissing the China trip as a waste if time? Personally I think it is significant, particularly as it is an invitation event and rg is quite possibly following up established contacts. If you want to dismiss it then fine, that's your opinion, but don't go changing your view through 180 degrees just to go with the flow. That's just pathetic.

I suspect approval for trigrid2 and therefore the IND could be pretty rapid. That day will be a good step forward!

The 'left field' comment was CH not RG.

There are probably some on eBay as well, but they'll be from China and the postage will be extortionate.

That's from 8th October 2012. Hardly relevant so why post it?!

How come that didn't get flagged up sooner on the reports from the AGM? It's pretty significant and heavy, or did I miss some of the reporting back?

What a silly cult.