RE: RW28 Jan 2019 15:15
I was trying to make a simple and fairly obvious point that the grant of a patent will normally add little or nothing to the sp because there is a sort of background assumption it will be granted, provided it is actually novel, original etc etc. From the outset it is hoped or assumed this will happen in any sensible business, if a patent is required, but try having a patent declined and see what that does to the sp! So if the application is suitably innovative (and any decent lawyer with patent experience will advise on the likelihood before the initial application is made I would imagine) then it should, in due course, get granted. It is never a given, but as a cornerstone to any business development it is generally assumed that it should get there in the end. Also in the case of Scancell I trust LD to have sufficient knowledge of her field that she wouldn't put in a patent that infringed or was not novel. It was a fairly low level, average sort of observation - I didn't realise it would involve being dragged to the headmaster's study, but some things never change.