Member Info for PM2022

Valtree would no doubt vote for it as it's his type of thing. We need everyone to vote. My view it's suicidal to vote yes to res given current market conditions and numbers requested. Therefore NO all the way from me.

Call your broker if you have not got an email. I believe the deadline might be tomorrow as they need a few days.

Hereshopin- As i understand it resolution 4 is a special resolution so they need 75% to pass. I have come across lots of holders most if not all appear to be voting no. Those stating otherwise don't understand the current markets and how dilutions work.

Still a great buy at these levels with a market cap of only 10 million but I just feel the timing is wrong for Res 4. Maybe after 201 is delivered.

I watched the interview again. A great job by Adam.

A few points:
1) They stated previously all the benefits of the first lab the last few months which was fair enough. Now they are saying they want further acquisitions to help make it unique and different to bring more customers. Great now they got 4 more possible acquisitions. Each time something else will get added and we keep getting diluted with possibly larger working capital to pay for it if we go down this route. This without much value adding news.

2) I got the impression the focus is more on growing the market cap than increasing the share price. You can be a 100 million company at 2p a share.

3) Suzy makes a point /example about VAL being profitable before shareholders wanting acquisitions. She knows very well how the SP was almost always considerably above 10p for the last 3 years. Therefore most LTHs are down therefore it makes sense to bring the SP to a slightly better level before attempting to go down the acquisitions route.

My conclusion is that I will stick to NO for resolution 4 as I feel it goes down the heavy dilution route and would destroy shareholder value with dilutions at low prices. I would like to see us at 25/30p before further acquisitions are requested and I don't see why it has to be as much as 4. That could be down over many years but not quickly.

I am fully expecting resolution 4 to be voted NO and to be fair with about 3 million cash we are in a strong position. My bet is on lots of news coming through and confidence building with a further acquisition at a less dilutive price later in the year after approval in June. For now a strong buy/hold but the deadline for the vote is coming so do vote.

It would be great to see Stella invest but people who invest do so with different strategies. Some only do it in secure companies generating excellent revenue/profit which is what I think Stella is trying to do. Also she has made her big money and doubt she wants to gain a few pounds here. She probably does the job to keep busy.

It's a fair strategy to grow the company but I feel at this moment of time it would lead to excess dilutions so growing a company and losing shareholder value can be two different things.

I have still not finished watching but my opinion is still the same which is why I believe most are voting no. Moving forward I can see value in the strategy but only at the right price and time . If as expected rev 4 is voted down for now then I see no reason why we cannot get to fair value before requesting slightly less shares say 20 million instead of 30 as the higher price will require less shares for the same value.

Lol they all make it very clear we are very undervalued. It's clear this will only go one way given all our assets huge upside imo. Very limited downside so clearly a great buy here.

I guess they want more voting rights for future resolutions and possibly to help with the voting for their jobs in June should they use the 30 million to acquire another lab.

No excuses for dragging us down to these levels with the 10 p placing. Therefore no to resolution 4. TIme to produce and grow the company as the SP increases and only when it increases....

Note ignore the derampers are only here because they want to buy cheaper otherwise go on other boards. Only issue is this is only going one way and that is up soon imo based on news due.

Not sure how that can be the case I only come across one person from all the platforms voting yes to res 4. They need 75% so it is not possible imo. It's suicidal to vote yes unless they can justify where they get cash from to run more than one lab at the same time.

My bet is on Res 4 to fail and next evaluation currently due from next week and 201 to come in quick succession taking us to 30p. I think in the summer they will request again and will get 20 million shares .

Metom you need to look on the bright side otherwise you will get one 1.54p not 15.4p lol.

We should get the evaluation result coming up in February so something good to look forward to.

Agree. It's a lack of confidence and question marks over the strategy not the actual assets we hold. That can change in an instant.

Disagree. She can easily say the same as what Suzy said maybe even give a rough timeline or an idea of what the delay is. Remember last year Suzy told everyone LOI will be signed before Christmas then the price went to 50s before news so you just don't know.

Not about price sensitive information. Val has little to no downside here provided we don't keep getting diluted unnecessarily at the wrong times. The focus should be on building the SP then growing not the other way around.

It will be good to hear from Stella and if she can make a statement regarding 201 that could be seen as a positive as that carries huge value for VAL.

Bullchit the 10p placing was last year so long gone and most that purchased averaged down so a slightly different situation. 11p placing apparently went to sticky hands.

Regardless with a 75% needed for them it's a good buy here as you kind of know it will be very hard for them to win that vote. As they say buy when others are fearful.

It’s a special resolution so they need 75 per cent to pass from what I here. Therefore will be voted down in my view so false fears. Let’s see what they say tomorrow though.

My issue is why if she is confident with 201 that she cannot get the news out the price goes to at least 25/30p and then asks for less shares say 15 million. If they were not intending to offload the 30 million for cheap then why ask for it. We also two got evaluations where the price can get to around the 20p mark so asking it at this moment of time and creating uncertainty only sends us lower and makes it more difficult. They just lack AIM experience and really don't know what they are doing. They could easily play this more smartly but clearly lack the ability to do this.

Some of the previous ones allow the current broker offer, the fundraise warrants and the adviser warrants to complete giving VAL cash and also gives them some space for placing for a much lower amount if required for working capital. It appears most are voting against Res 4 as that could result in a huge dilution and it could go down a constant dilution route requiring numerous cash call dilutions until they make profit. That is my understanding from it. DYOR.

Same here great post Porky.

It's like a 4G pitch with floodlights and one is needed for each corner of the 4G pitch but unfortunately for Suzy she does not have the money to turn on the floodlights let alone purchase them.